Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40374613›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025

COMPASS: Computational mapping of patient-therapist alliance strategies with language modeling.

Baihan Lin, Djallel Bouneffouf, Yulia Landa, Rachel Jespersen, Cheryl Corcoran, Guillermo Cecchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Baihan LinDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. baihan.lin@mssm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7979-5509
Djallel BouneffoufIBM Research, T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.
Yulia LandaDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Rachel JespersenDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Cheryl CorcoranDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8902-4353
Guillermo CecchiIBM Research, T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-8348

Funding

Phenotypes REimagined to Define Clinical Treatment and Outcome Research (PREDiCTOR)U01MH136535 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CECCHI, GUILLERMO, CORCORAN, CHERYL MARY · 2024 to 2025
$8.2M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH136535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapeutic working alliance is a critical predictor of psychotherapy success. Traditionally, working alliance assessment relies on questionnaires completed by both therapists and patients. In this paper, we present COMPASS, a novel framework to directly infer the therapeutic working alliance from the natural language used in psychotherapy sessions. Our approach leverages advanced large language models (LLMs) to analyze session transcripts and map them to distributed representations. These representations capture the semantic similarities between the dialogues and psychometric instruments, such as the Working Alliance Inventory. Analyzing a dataset of over 950 sessions spanning diverse psychiatric conditions -- including anxiety (N = 498), depression (N = 377), schizophrenia (N = 71), and suicidal tendencies (N = 12) -- collected between 1970 and 2012, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in providing fine-grained mapping of patient-therapist alignment trajectories, offering interpretable insights for clinical practice, and identifying emerging patterns related to the condition being treated. By employing various deep learning-based topic modeling techniques in combination with prompting generative language models, we analyze the topical characteristics of different psychiatric conditions and how these topics evolve during each turn of the conversation. This integrated framework enhances the understanding of therapeutic interactions, enables timely feedback for therapists on the quality of therapeutic relationships, and provides clear, actionable insights to improve the effectiveness of psychotherapy.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersNatural Language ProcessingProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychotherapyTherapeutic AllianceAdultDeep LearningFemaleHumansLanguageMale

Identifiers

PMID40374613
PMCPMC12081631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.