Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40374594›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2025

Long-Term Efficacy of Pembrolizumab and the Clinical Utility of ctDNA in Locally Advanced dMMR/MSI-H Solid Tumors.

Michael LaPelusa, Wei Qiao, Bryan Iorgulescu, Francis San Lucas, Keyur Patel, Deepak Bhamidipati, Jane Varkey Thomas, Nancy You, Wai Chin Foo, Dipen Maru and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04082572 (Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab for Patients With Mismatch Repair Deficient Locally Advanced Solid Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04082572 phase2completednot on this map

Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab for Patients With Mismatch Repair Deficient Locally Advanced Solid Cancers

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2019 to 2024Enrolled35ConditionsLocally Advanced Malignant Solid NeoplasmArmsPembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michael LaPelusaDivision of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. mblapelusa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6078-0561
Wei QiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Bryan IorgulescuDepartment of Hematopathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Francis San LucasDepartment of Hematopathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Keyur PatelDepartment of Hematopathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Deepak BhamidipatiDivision of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jane Varkey ThomasDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Nancy YouDepartment of Colorectal Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-288X
Wai Chin FooDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0471-4911
Dipen MaruDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9134-7709
Selvi ThirumurthiDepartment of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Van MorrisDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4911-2252
Scott KopetzDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9647-3416
Michael OvermanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kaysia LudfordDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy can induce pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with localized deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. The long-term outcomes of these patients are unknown, as is the clinical utility of measuring circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Follow-up was evaluated in patients enrolled in a phase II trial (NCT04082572) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with localized dMMR/MSI-H tumors. The primary outcomes of this trial have previously been reported. 3-year EFS and OS rates were 80% (95% CI: 66% - 93%) and 94% (95% CI: 86% - 100%). Patients without detectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab had higher 3-year EFS and OS rates than patients with detectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab (3-year EFS 92% vs 20%; p < 0.001, 3-year OS 100% vs 80%; p < 0.001). Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who had undetectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab were more likely to have pCR compared to those with detectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab (91% vs 0%; p = 0.03). Patients with CRC who were managed non-operatively and had undetectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab had a higher 2-year EFS rate than patients with detectable ctDNA after pembrolizumab (100% vs 33%; p = 0.03). Pembrolizumab demonstrates long-term efficacy in patients with localized dMMR/MSI-H tumors.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCirculating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCirculating Tumor DNApembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID40374594
PMCPMC12081696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.