Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40374529›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2025

Modern wheat has deeper roots than ancient wheats: is this an adaptation to higher productivity?

Arnesta Odone, Kristian Thorup-Kristensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arnesta OdoneDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 30, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5219-5474
Kristian Thorup-KristensenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 30, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5476-985X

Funding

Promilleafgiftsfonden
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThere is growing interest in the production of ancient grains including emmer, einkorn and spelt, particularly in low-input systems. Differences in their root systems and how these affect water and nitrogen uptake are not well known, but can offer important insights into the effects of plant breeding on resource use and root physiology, which can inform breeding of future crops.

methodsIn this study, we used imaging in minirhizotron tubes to evaluate root development in emmer, einkorn, spelt and modern wheat growing under field conditions, taking images to 2.2 m soil depth. We evaluated water stress in the different species using carbon isotope discrimination and used a nitrogen tracer to compare N uptake over time. KEY

resultsThe results show that modern wheats have deeper and more efficient root systems. Modern wheats showed less water stress in late developmental stages due to their deeper roots which allow access to deep soil water, and can therefore sustain high grain yields. They were also able to translocate N more efficiently to the grain. The results contradict previous hypotheses that modern wheat has shallow rooting systems due to high inputs, showing that where more nutrient resources are available, deeper roots have become important for water uptake to support higher yields.

conclusionsThis is the first field study of roots of ancient and modern wheats, where we clearly see that there are substantial differences between the root systems. These results help to explain how past selection for yield has affected below-ground crop physiology.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalPlant RootsTriticumCarbon IsotopesCrops, AgriculturalNitrogenSoilWaterCarbon IsotopesNitrogenSoilWater13C15Nisotopic tracerRoot physiologyT. aestivum ssp. speltaT. monococcumTriticium aestivumTriticum turgidum ssp. dicoccumwater stress

Identifiers

PMID40374529
PMCPMC12682843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.