Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40374222›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Study protocol for a descriptive analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing uptake and performance in singleton and twin pregnancies using Ontario birth registry data.

Erin Collins, Bounhome Soukkhaphone, Kara Bellai-Dussault, Lynn Meng, Mahin Ahmadi Pishkuhi, Michele Rubini, Shelley Dougan, Julian Little

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erin CollinsSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ecoll098@uottawa.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4209-1786
Bounhome SoukkhaphoneLao Tropical and Public Health Institute, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Kara Bellai-DussaultPrenatal Screening Ontario for Better Outcomes Registry & Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lynn MengPrenatal Screening Ontario for Better Outcomes Registry & Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mahin Ahmadi PishkuhiSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Michele RubiniDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Shelley DouganPrenatal Screening Ontario for Better Outcomes Registry & Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Julian LittleSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health Ottawa, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5026-5531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the availability of funded first-tier non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for twin pregnancies in Ontario, Canada, research gaps persist regarding the feasibility and effectiveness of NIPT in this demographic. This protocol documents our planned comprehensive overview of twin data from the large Ontario provincial registry and evaluates the performance of NIPT among singleton and twin pregnancies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a descriptive study using routinely collected data housed in the Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario. The study population will include all singleton and twin pregnancies with an estimated date of delivery between 1 September 2016 and 31 March 2023. We will compare patient characteristics, NIPT uptake and test performance metrics (including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value) between singleton and twin pregnancies. Subgroup analyses will be conducted, including assessment by the mode of conception, trimester of initial screening, age of the pregnant individual and eligibility for publicly funded first-tier NIPT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from the Research Ethics Boards of the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (24/01PE) and the University of Ottawa (H-04-24-10309). Results will be disseminated through scientific conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. By making our protocol and findings publicly available, we aim to establish a foundational reference for future investigations in Ontario. Additionally, we seek to support the design and implementation of further studies on NIPT in twin pregnancies in Canada and elsewhere.

Indexed as

Noninvasive Prenatal TestingPregnancy, TwinPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleHumansOntarioPregnancyRegistriesResearch DesignPregnancyPrenatal diagnosisREGISTRIES

Identifiers

PMID40374222
PMCPMC12083262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.