ArticleBMJ global health2025
Design, coverage and utilisation of maternity conditional cash programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOver the years, conditional cash transfers (CCTs) have become a popular tool to enhance demand for, and access to, essential healthcare services. While the immediate goal of CCTs is to improve the affordability of healthcare services, these are also being used to improve all health-seeking behaviour outcomes across countries. We examined how the design, operationalisation and facilitation of maternity benefits programmes have evolved, and the advantages and challenges that accompany in low- and middle-income country settings.
methodsA scoping review was conducted across three major electronic databases: PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Cochrane library database. We also reviewed grey literature and used the snowball search approach to review the websites of numerous public health organisations and repositories. Based on set inclusion criteria and protocols, two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. This was followed by detailed full-text screening. Disagreements, if any, were resolved by a third researcher.
resultsOf 235 articles identified, 65 met the inclusion criteria. These articles shed light on a wide variety of CCT design features, including benefit sizes, monitoring and compliance mechanisms, and periodicity of transfers, insights on eligibility criteria, conditionalities to be fulfilled to avail the benefits such as mandatory antenatal and postnatal checks, institutional delivery, immunisation etc. Challenges highlighted include poor awareness and low community participation and lack of agency among women in decisions about use of cash among demand-side constraints. Supply-side issues range from lack of role clarity and ownership among service providers, inefficient fund flow, and inadequate staff and infrastructure provision to tackle increased service utilisation.
conclusionCCTs have the potential to improve access to maternal and child health services, but need effective design and operational processes, which should be closely monitored. CCTs could also benefit from addressing inequities by including more women from vulnerable and lower socio-economic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.