Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40373816›Full record

ReviewZentralblatt fur Chirurgie2025

[Indications for Lung Transplantation - Updates Since the Last ISHLT Recommendations].

Zsofia Kovacs, Alberto Benazzo, Peter Jaksch

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zsofia KovacsThoraxchirurgie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.
Alberto BenazzoThoraxchirurgie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.
Peter JakschThoraxchirurgie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung transplantation has evolved continuously since its first successful procedures in the 1960 s. The current guidelines from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) emphasise increasingly individualised patient assessment, which, in addition to the underlying lung disease, considers factors such as comorbidities, frailty, age, and social aspects. The expanded indications for lung transplantation are reflected in the refined risk assessment, which particularly includes patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Furthermore, the criteria for patients with a history of cancer and those with infections such as HIV or multidrug-resistant organisms have been made more flexible, leading to a more inclusive transplantation policy. A key focus is on early transplant counselling, allowing patients the opportunity for transplantation before they develop acute exacerbations. These updated guidelines aim to maximise both the survival rates and the quality of life of transplant patients, through differentiated and risk-adjusted decision-making.

Indexed as

Lung DiseasesLung TransplantationGermanyHumansPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID40373816
PMCPMC12133323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.