Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40373304›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Screen Exposure and Early Childhood Development in Resource-Limited Regions: Findings From a Population-Based Survey Study.

Yuyin Xiao, Dorien Emmers, Shanshan Li, Hanwen Zhang, Andrew Rule, Scott Rozelle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuyin XiaoStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4621-9628
Dorien EmmersChinese Studies Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7750-9196
Shanshan LiCenter for International Cooperation and Disciplinary Innovation of Income Distribution and Public Finance (111 Center), Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9611-9134
Hanwen ZhangStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2436-2793
Andrew RuleStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5674-8550
Scott RozelleStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5053-0243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe content of children's screen exposure and interactive coviewing with caregivers are important determinants of early childhood development (ECD) that have been overlooked in past research in resource-limited rural regions. Given the prevalence of digital devices and diverse digital content today, determining screen use practices that minimize the negative impacts on children's development is crucial for promoting healthy screen use among children.

objectiveThis study aims to examine screen exposure among children aged <3 years in rural China and investigate its relationship with ECD outcomes, focusing on duration, content, coviewing, and interaction.

methodsThe sample includes all children aged between 6 and 26 months and their primary caregivers residing in the study area. A survey of screen exposure and household characteristics was conducted for 1052 eligible households. Caregivers reported the duration of screen exposure, defined as the average daily screen time over the past month; the content of exposure, defined by the time spent on educational and child-friendly content; and the caregiver's presence and interaction with the child during exposure. ECD outcomes were evaluated using the third edition of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development assessment scale and the Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment. Ordinary least squares regression, logistic regression, and chi-square tests were conducted.

resultsIn total, 28.23% (297/1052) of the children in our sample were first exposed to screens before the age of 12 months. Children exposed to screens had an average daily screen time of 27.57 (SD 38.90) minutes. Children who were exposed to screens before the age of 12 months and those who had longer screen time between the ages of 12 and 18 months were more likely to be at risk of motor developmental delays. Children exposed to educational content for >15 minutes on a daily basis had fewer social-emotional or behavioral problems than those with no screen exposure and a lower risk of delay in motor skills development than those exposed to educational content for <15 minutes on a daily basis. Caregiver interaction during screen exposure was associated with a lower risk of cognitive and language delays and better socioemotional skills.

conclusionsThe type of content viewed and how caregivers engaged in children's screen time were strongly associated with ECD outcomes. Guiding parents to select educational content for their children and engaging in interactive coviewing may better protect children from the negative effects of screen exposure. The findings complement conclusions regarding the impact of screen exposure on ECD in resource-limited rural areas.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentScreen TimeCaregiversChild, PreschoolChinaFemaleHumansInfantMaleRural PopulationSurveys and Questionnairesdigital media viewinginfancylow- and middle-income countriesrural areascreen timescreen use

Identifiers

PMID40373304
PMCPMC12123236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.