ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Deep Learning-Based Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation Prediction Using Flow-Volume and Volume-Time Curve Imaging: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting the progression risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in high-risk individuals based on whole-lung radiomics and deep learning: a multicenter study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in predicting COPD exacerbations using multimodal data: a systematic review.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Early Detection and Prediction of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- SpiroLLM: Finetuning pretrained LLMs to understand spirogram time series with clinical validation in COPD reporting.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Prolonged expiratory time constant and risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbations in stable COPD.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Specialty-led inpatient chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management and mortality: a propensity-weighted cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Innovative Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Whole-Course Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Global Scoping Review of Diagnostic, Symptom-Based, and Outcome Prediction Approaches.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Advances in artificial intelligence applications for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and progressive respiratory condition characterized by persistent airflow limitation and symptoms such as dyspnea, cough, and sputum production. Acute exacerbations (AE) of COPD (AE-COPD) are key determinants of disease progression; yet, existing predictive models relying mainly on spirometric measurements, such as forced expiratory volume in 1 second, reflect only a fraction of the physiological information embedded in respiratory function tests. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled more sophisticated analyses of full spirometric curves, including flow-volume loops and volume-time curves, facilitating the identification of complex patterns associated with increased exacerbation risk.
objectiveThis study aimed to determine whether a predictive model that integrates clinical data and spirometry images with the use of AI improves accuracy in predicting moderate-to-severe and severe AE-COPD events compared to a clinical-only model.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using COPD registry data from 2 teaching hospitals from January 2004 to December 2020. The study included a total of 10,492 COPD cases, divided into a development cohort (6870 cases) and an external validation cohort (3622 cases). The AI-enhanced model (AI-PFT-Clin) used a combination of clinical variables (eg, history of AE-COPD, dyspnea, and inhaled treatments) and spirometry image data (flow-volume loop and volume-time curves). In contrast, the Clin model used only clinical variables. The primary outcomes were moderate-to-severe and severe AE-COPD events within a year of spirometry.
resultsIn the external validation cohort, the AI-PFT-Clin model outperformed the Clin model, showing an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.755 versus 0.730 (P<.05) for moderate-to-severe AE-COPD and 0.713 versus 0.675 (P<.05) for severe AE-COPD. The AI-PFT-Clin model demonstrated reliable predictive capability across subgroups, including younger patients and those without previous exacerbations. Higher AI-PFT-Clin scores correlated with elevated AE-COPD risk (adjusted hazard ratio for Q4 vs Q1: 4.21, P<.001), with sustained predictive stability over a 10-year follow-up period.
conclusionsThe AI-PFT-Clin model, by integrating clinical data with spirometry images, offers enhanced predictive accuracy for AE-COPD events compared to a clinical-only approach. This AI-based framework facilitates the early identification of high-risk individuals through the detection of physiological abnormalities not captured by conventional metrics. The model's robust performance and long-term predictive stability suggest its potential utility in proactive COPD management and personalized intervention planning. These findings highlight the promise of incorporating advanced AI techniques into routine COPD management, particularly in populations traditionally seen as lower risk, supporting improved management of COPD through tailored patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.