Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40373295›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

AI-Assisted Hypothesis Generation to Address Challenges in Cardiotoxicity Research: Simulation Study Using ChatGPT With GPT-4o.

Yilan Li, Tianshu Gu, Chengyuan Yang, Minghui Li, Congyi Wang, Lan Yao, Weikuan Gu, DianJun Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yilan Li *The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5706-0088
Tianshu Gu *Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0287-3423
Chengyuan YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and BME-Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Centre, Memphis, TN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6101-6290
Minghui LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1909-6260
Congyi WangDiabetes Research Center, Qatar Biomedical Research Institute (QBRI), Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU), Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7914-168X
Lan YaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and BME-Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Centre, Memphis, TN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-4082
Weikuan GuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and BME-Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Centre, Memphis, TN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-8088
DianJun SunThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Centre for Endemic Disease Control, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Medical University, Key Laboratory of Etiologic Epidemiology, Education Bureau of Heilongjiang Province & Ministry of Health, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1701-4305

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiotoxicity is a major concern in heart disease research because it can lead to severe cardiac damage, including heart failure and arrhythmias.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the ability of ChatGPT with GPT-4o to generate innovative research hypotheses to address 5 major challenges in cardiotoxicity research: the complexity of mechanisms, variability among patients, the lack of detection sensitivity, the lack of reliable biomarkers, and the limitations of animal models.

methodsChatGPT with GPT-4o was used to generate multiple hypotheses for each of the 5 challenges. These hypotheses were then independently evaluated by 3 experts for novelty and feasibility. ChatGPT with GPT-4o subsequently selected the most promising hypothesis from each category and provided detailed experimental plans, including background, rationale, experimental design, expected outcomes, potential pitfalls, and alternative approaches.

resultsChatGPT with GPT-4o generated 96 hypotheses, of which 13 (14%) were rated as highly novel and 62 (65%) as moderately novel. The average group score of 3.85 indicated a strong level of innovation in these hypotheses. Literature searching identified at least 1 relevant publication for 28 (29%) of the 96 hypotheses. The selected hypotheses included using single-cell RNA sequencing to understand cellular heterogeneity, integrating artificial intelligence with genetic profiles for personalized cardiotoxicity risk prediction, applying machine learning to electrocardiogram data for enhanced detection sensitivity, using multi-omics approaches for biomarker discovery, and developing 3D bioprinted heart tissues to overcome the limitations of animal models. Our group's evaluation of the 30 dimensions of the experimental plans for the 5 hypotheses selected by ChatGPT with GPT-4o revealed consistent strengths in the background, rationale, and alternative approaches, with most of the hypotheses (20/30, 67%) receiving scores of ≥4 in these areas. While the hypotheses were generally well received, the experimental designs were often deemed overly ambitious, highlighting the need for more practical considerations.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that ChatGPT with GPT-4o can generate innovative and potentially impactful hypotheses for overcoming critical challenges in cardiotoxicity research. These findings suggest that artificial intelligence-assisted hypothesis generation could play a crucial role in advancing the field of cardiotoxicity, leading to more accurate predictions, earlier detection, and better patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCardiotoxicityAnimalsBiomarkersComputer SimulationGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansBiomarkersAIartificial intelligencecardiotoxicityChatGPT with GPT-4ohearthypothesis generation

Identifiers

PMID40373295
PMCPMC12123237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.