Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40373281›Full record

Trial reportBlood2025

A phase 2 trial of CHOP with anti-CCR4 antibody mogamulizumab for older patients with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.

Makoto Yoshimitsu, Ilseung Choi, Shigeru Kusumoto, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Atae Utsunomiya, Youko Suehiro, Tomonori Hidaka, Kisato Nosaka, Hidenori Sasaki, Shinya Rai and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Novel agents and therapeutic advances in T cell lymphoma.International journal of hematology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Makoto YoshimitsuDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5935-0385
Ilseung ChoiDepartment of Hematology and Cell Therapy, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shigeru KusumotoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6546-1279
Mototsugu ShimokawaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8140-4565
Atae UtsunomiyaDepartment of Hematology, Imamura General Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Youko SuehiroDepartment of Hematology and Cell Therapy, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomonori HidakaDivision of Hematology, Diabetes, and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Kisato NosakaDepartment of Hematology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6682-2451
Hidenori SasakiDivision of Medical Oncology, Hematology, and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shinya RaiDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3929-9751
Shinobu TamuraDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1150-0970
Satsuki OwatariDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Kagoshima Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan.
Ki-Ryang KohDepartment of Hematology, Osaka General Hospital of West Japan Railway Company, Osaka, Japan.
Daisuke NakamuraDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Masahito TokunagaDepartment of Hematology, Imamura General Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1296-9006
Masaaki SekineDivision of Hematology, Diabetes, and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Yuma SakamotoDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9916-4862
Hiroshi InagakiDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Takashi IshidaDepartment of Immunology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-0777
Kenji IshitsukaDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7030-497X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractNo standard of care for older patients with aggressive adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) has been established. We evaluated the efficacy of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) every 2 weeks with mogamulizumab (Moga; Moga-CHOP-14) for older patients with untreated ATL. In this multicenter phase 2 trial, patients aged ≥66 years and those aged 56 to 65 years ineligible for transplantation received 6 cycles of Moga-CHOP-14, followed by 2 cycles of Moga monotherapy. The primary end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were the complete response (CR) rate, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), 1-year event-free survival (EFS), and safety. We also investigated the impact of CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) mutation and Moga-associated cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) on PFS and OS. The study protocol was amended to allow the dosing interval to be extended to 21 days at the physician's discretion. Among 48 evaluable patients, the 1-year PFS was 36.2% (90% confidence interval, 24.9-47.6), with a median follow-up of 1.6 years. The 1-year OS and EFS were 66.0% and 29.9%, respectively. CR and ORR were 64.6% and 91.7%. No unexpected toxicities were observed. Of 47 patients who received ≥2 cycles of CHOP, 20 (42.6%) received CHOP-14, among whom 12 (25.5%) completed 6 cycles. CCR4 mutation and Moga-associated cAEs were associated with better OS. This study showed that Moga-CHOP significantly improved PFS, although the optimal interval for CHOP remains undetermined. Moga-CHOP is now considered a preferable first-line treatment for this patient population. This trial was registered at https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-top as #jRCTs041180130.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsLeukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-CellReceptors, CCR4AgedAged, 80 and overCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrednisoneVincristineAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCCR4 protein, humanCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinmogamulizumabPrednisoneReceptors, CCR4Vincristine

Identifiers

PMID40373281
PMCPMC12883846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.