Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40373216›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025

Patients' Expectations for App-Based Therapy in Knee Osteoarthritis: User-Centered Design Approach.

Pika Krištof Mirt, Karmen Erjavec, Sabina Krsnik, Petra Kotnik, Hussein Mohsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pika Krištof MirtGeneral Hospital Novo Mesto, Novo Mesto, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7051-2955
Karmen Erjavec *Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Novo Mesto, Na Loko 2, Novo Mesto, 8000, Slovenia, 386 040869839.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4971-0292
Sabina Krsnik *Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Novo Mesto, Na Loko 2, Novo Mesto, 8000, Slovenia, 386 040869839.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-7623
Petra Kotnik *Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Novo Mesto, Na Loko 2, Novo Mesto, 8000, Slovenia, 386 040869839.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3280-5335
Hussein Mohsen *Artros Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6263-8865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) requires long-term treatment that faces significant barriers, including inadequate physiotherapy services, especially in Slovenia and comparable European countries. Mobile health apps offer a promising solution to improve accessibility and adherence to KOA treatment. objectives: This study aimed to identify expectations of patients with KOA for app-based therapy, determine the functional requirements, and assess the main barriers and benefits of using mobile apps for KOA management. It also examined these factors about demographic data (gender, age, and education level) and motivation to perform knee exercises. Methods: A mixed methods approach was used, integrating quantitative data from a structured questionnaire and qualitative data from in-depth interviews. The purposive sample comprised 82 patients with symptomatic KOA graded 1-3 on the Kellgren-Lawrence scale, excluding those with cognitive impairments, wheelchair dependency, significant comorbidities, or language barriers. Results: The analysis revealed that 53.7% (44/82) of patients preferred smartphones, while 40.2% (33/82) favored PCs for remote KOA management, citing accessibility and convenience. Exercise videos received the highest rating (µ=9.45), followed by goal setting and tracking (µ=8.95) and regular e-messages (µ=8.83). Telephone consultations with physiotherapists were also highly valued (µ=8.41). Significant differences were observed in the perceived importance of key disease information (F9=2.077; P=.04) and exercise videos (F9=2.788; P=.05) based on motivation levels but not by gender, age, or education. Perceptions of the appropriate duration of physical activity varied with motivation levels (F9=2.490; P=.02) but not with demographic factors. Men rated ease of use (4.93 vs 4.71; F1=3.961; P=.05) and the clarity of the exercise flow display higher than women. The most significant barrier was inaccurate disease information (µ=3.96), with notable differences across age groups. Younger participants (younger than 40 years) and those aged 51-60 years expressed concerns about time management and information accuracy. Patients highlighted the ability to rewatch exercises as a key app feature, while time efficiency and improved access to physiotherapists were highly valued for convenience. Enhanced communication and accurate information were essential for building trust and ensuring effective treatment. Conclusions: Mobile health apps for KOA management should be designed with a user-centered approach, prioritizing accessibility, motivation, and effective communication. Key functionalities include high-quality exercise videos, goal setting, symptom tracking, and regular electronic reminders. Mitigating user-reported barriers and integrating age-specific adaptations can enhance adherence and therapeutic outcomes. The findings highlight the potential of mobile health technologies to optimize KOA self-management and improve patient quality of life, particularly in health care systems with limited physiotherapy accessibility, such as those in Slovenia.

Indexed as

apparthritisbarriers and benefitschronic disease managementdigital healthexercisesexperiencefunctional requirementsjointknee osteoarthritismHealthmotivationopinionosteoarthritispatient engagementperspectivephysiotherapypreferencerheumatologyuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID40373216
PMCPMC12097652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.