Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40373117›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

"Where does my menstruation come from?" Experiences and costs of menstrual hygiene management among Rwandese school girls.

Kirsten Beata Dodroe, Lilian Nantume Wampande, Arlene Nishimwe, Mutesi Mukinisha, Janna M Schurer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kirsten Beata DodroeCenter for One Health, University of Global Health Equity, Butaro, Rwanda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9648-5174
Lilian Nantume WampandeCenter for One Health, University of Global Health Equity, Butaro, Rwanda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-6206
Arlene NishimweDivision of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Global Health Equity, Butaro, Rwanda.
Mutesi MukinishaCenter for One Health, University of Global Health Equity, Butaro, Rwanda.
Janna M SchurerCenter for One Health, University of Global Health Equity, Butaro, Rwanda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6122-5332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Government of Rwanda recently instated a minimum menstrual hygiene management (MHM) package for all schools; however, coverage is not universal, and there remains little information on the availability or financial burden of MHM resources in rural and remote areas. This study sought to describe Rwandese secondary school girls' perceptions and practices of MHM, their financial costs, and their access to MHM related infrastructure and products. A mixed-methods survey was conducted in three phases, namely (1) a quantitative questionnaire (2) a qualitative 'Jar Voices' activity, and (3) an observational Water, Sanitation and hygiene (WASH) checklist. One Lower Secondary School (LSS) of each type (private, public and government-aided) was randomly selected from each of Rwanda's five provinces, and all LSS2 and LSS3 girls who reached menarche were invited to participate. Overall, 1,117 girls participated, including 351 (31.4%) from public schools, 543 (48.6%) from government aided schools and 223 (20.0%) from private schools. Only 35.7% of the girls correctly identified the origin of menstruation. The main source of information on menstruation was mothers. Most girls (82.5%) used single-use sanitary pads, and a small proportion (14.6%) relied on reusable cloth pads. The most identified barriers to accessing sanitary products were financial barriers. The average cost of menstrual products per cycle varied between RWF 3,100 in private schools, to RWF 4,000/4,300 in public/government-aided schools, and were covered mainly by parents. Most schools had gender-sensitive sanitation facilities, mainly pit latrines (86.7%), but only 53.3%, 33.33% and 20% provided water, soap and MHM commodities respectively. The results underscored the need for continuous menstrual education aimed at both girls and parents, and capitalizing on low-cost initiatives that can improve access to sanitary pads and WASH/sanitary facilities in schools.

Identifiers

PMID40373117
PMCPMC12080923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.