ArticlePloS one2025
Socioecological benefits of academic greenspace for human health, plant, and pollinator diversity: A mixed-method study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSignificant risks to the health of humans and ecosystems are posed by environmental pollution, urban warming, and fragmentation, which are primary urban factors that contribute to the deterioration of urban ecosystems. The purpose of this multidisciplinary study is to compare greenspaces in university campuses and the host cities in order to assess how valuable they are for promoting human and ecosystem health in Nigeria.
methodsMixed-methods research that will be conducted in five tertiary institutions and their host cities in southwestern Nigeria. Based on the objectives, the study is divided into four work packages (WP). WP 1 will use suitable sampling traps and scheduled field observations to quantify the diversity of plants and pollinators. Quantitative evaluation of well-being and mental health will be done in WP 2. In WP 3, the relationship between ecosystem health and mental health will be examined and in-depth interviews will be used to explore the socioecological perceptions and interaction of people with specific indicators of ecosystem health in greenspace. In WP 4, a nature-based intervention will be developed and evaluated in a pilot study to determine its feasibility and acceptability.
resultsThe 2023 TETFund National Research Fund Intervention provided funding for this work, which is currently ongoing and results are not yet available.
conclusionThis project will provide scientific knowledge to support evidence-based policy for relevant stakeholders and regulatory organisations, with the goal of promoting greenspace infrastructure in Nigerian tertiary institutions. This article is focused on describing the research design, as the study is currently on-going hence, there is no conclusion yet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.