ArticlePloS one2025
Apple varieties, diseases, and distinguishing between fresh and rotten through deep learning approaches.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning for apple leaf disease diagnosis: a comparative study with convolutional neural networks and transformers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on Apple Surface Disease Detection Method Based on Improved YOLOv11s.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apples are one of the most productive fruits in the world, in addition to their nutritional and health advantages for humans. Even with the continuous development of AI in agriculture in general and apples in particular, automated systems continue to encounter challenges identifying rotten fruit and variations within the same apple category, as well as similarity in type, color, and shape of different fruit varieties. These issues, in addition to apple diseases, substantially impact the economy, productivity, and marketing quality. In this paper, we first provide a novel comprehensive collection named Apple Fruit Varieties Collection (AFVC) with 29,750 images through 85 classes. Second, we distinguish fresh and rotten apples with Apple Fruit Quality Categorization (AFQC), which has 2,320 photos. Third, an Apple Diseases Extensive Collection (ADEC), comprised of 2,976 images with seven classes, was offered. Fourth, following the state of the art, we develop an Optimized Apple Orchard Model (OAOM) with a new loss function named measured focal cross-entropy (MFCE), which assists in improving the proposed model's efficiency. The proposed OAOM gives the highest performance for apple varieties identification with AFVC; accuracy was 93.85%. For the apples rotten recognition with AFQC, accuracy was 98.28%. For the identification of the diseases via ADEC, it was 99.66%. OAOM works with high efficiency and outperforms the baselines. The suggested technique boosts apple system automation with numerous duties and outstanding effectiveness. This research benefits the growth of apple's robotic vision, development policies, automatic sorting systems, and decision-making enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.