Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40373028›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Analysis of safety risks in mixed driving of manual and automatic vehicles: multiple perspectives.

Yaqin He, Jun Xia, Jiayin Dai

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yaqin HeSchool of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0009-0009-6456-102X
Jun XiaSchool of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jiayin DaiSchool of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve traffic safety in mixed traffic involving human-driven and autonomous vehicles, this study explored safety risk factors from multiple perspectives. Based on crash reports involving autonomous vehicles (AVs) in the California, United States, the XGBoost algorithm and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis were used to investigate the factors affecting accident severity. Association rule mining was employed to analyze the factors contributing to emergency braking events, based on field data from driverless taxi operations in China. Additionally, using data collected from questionnaires, the risk perception factors of different traffic participants were examined using the average degree of aggressiveness method. The results of three aspects analysis revealed that risk factors associated with mixed traffic were concentrated in areas such as weekdays, road sections, multiple lanes, roads with central medians, lack of control, and adverse environments. Finally, some safety improvement suggestions are recommended.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAutomobile DrivingAutomobilesSafetyAdultAlgorithmsCaliforniaChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40373028
PMCPMC12080778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.