ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Development and validation of an AI algorithm to generate realistic and meaningful counterfactuals for retinal imaging based on diffusion models.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Counterfactual reasoning is often used by humans in clinical settings. For imaging based specialties such as ophthalmology, it would be beneficial to have an AI model that can create counterfactual images, illustrating answers to questions like "If the subject had had diabetic retinopathy, how would the fundus image have looked?". Such an AI model could aid in training of clinicians or in patient education through visuals that answer counterfactual queries. We used large-scale retinal image datasets containing color fundus photography (CFP) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images to train ordinary and adversarially robust classifiers that classify healthy and disease categories. In addition, we trained an unconditional diffusion model to generate diverse retinal images including ones with disease lesions. During sampling, we then combined the diffusion model with classifier guidance to achieve realistic and meaningful counterfactual images maintaining the subject's retinal image structure. We found that our method generated counterfactuals by introducing or removing the necessary disease-related features. We conducted an expert study to validate that generated counterfactuals are realistic and clinically meaningful. Generated color fundus images were indistinguishable from real images and were shown to contain clinically meaningful lesions. Generated OCT images appeared realistic, but could be identified by experts with higher than chance probability. This shows that combining diffusion models with classifier guidance can achieve realistic and meaningful counterfactuals even for high-resolution medical images such as CFP images. Such images could be used for patient education or training of medical professionals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.