Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40373008›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Development and validation of an AI algorithm to generate realistic and meaningful counterfactuals for retinal imaging based on diffusion models.

Indu Ilanchezian, Valentyn Boreiko, Laura Kühlewein, Ziwei Huang, Murat Seçkin Ayhan, Matthias Hein, Lisa Koch, Philipp Berens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Indu IlanchezianHertie Institute for AI in Brain Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Valentyn BoreikoTübingen AI Center, Tübingen, Germany.
Laura KühleweinCenter for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-8681
Ziwei HuangHertie Institute for AI in Brain Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Murat Seçkin AyhanInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matthias HeinTübingen AI Center, Tübingen, Germany.
Lisa KochHertie Institute for AI in Brain Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Philipp BerensHertie Institute for AI in Brain Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-4727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Counterfactual reasoning is often used by humans in clinical settings. For imaging based specialties such as ophthalmology, it would be beneficial to have an AI model that can create counterfactual images, illustrating answers to questions like "If the subject had had diabetic retinopathy, how would the fundus image have looked?". Such an AI model could aid in training of clinicians or in patient education through visuals that answer counterfactual queries. We used large-scale retinal image datasets containing color fundus photography (CFP) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images to train ordinary and adversarially robust classifiers that classify healthy and disease categories. In addition, we trained an unconditional diffusion model to generate diverse retinal images including ones with disease lesions. During sampling, we then combined the diffusion model with classifier guidance to achieve realistic and meaningful counterfactual images maintaining the subject's retinal image structure. We found that our method generated counterfactuals by introducing or removing the necessary disease-related features. We conducted an expert study to validate that generated counterfactuals are realistic and clinically meaningful. Generated color fundus images were indistinguishable from real images and were shown to contain clinically meaningful lesions. Generated OCT images appeared realistic, but could be identified by experts with higher than chance probability. This shows that combining diffusion models with classifier guidance can achieve realistic and meaningful counterfactuals even for high-resolution medical images such as CFP images. Such images could be used for patient education or training of medical professionals.

Identifiers

PMID40373008
PMCPMC12080772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.