ArticlePloS one2025
Scenic area attractiveness in Dali City and its influencing factors evaluated using multi-source spatiotemporal data.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multi-source behavioral data framework for interpretable urban tourism forecasting.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scenic area attractiveness is a core factor in urban tourism development. Developments in social media and multi-source spatiotemporal data provide a basis for studying complex tourist behaviors, overcoming the limitations of traditional interview survey data. This study combines point of interest (POI), mobile signaling, and microblog check-in data to analyze scenic area popularity in Dali using kernel density analysis, hotspot analysis, and gravity models. It also uses ROST-CM6 to perform sentiment analysis on microblog check-in and text data to obtain tourist satisfaction, and combines the popularity and satisfaction to assess scenic area attractiveness. Additionally, GeoDetector is used to examine the impact of subjective human factors, objective factors of the attractions themselves, and the number of POI facilities around the attractions on the scenic area attractiveness in Dali. We obtained several key findings. First, the distribution of scenic areas in Dali City showed a two-center, multi-point pattern, including two core scenic areas (i.e., Dali Ancient City and Xizhou Ancient Town) and numerous scattered areas. Second, the majority of scenic areas in Dali City were more active in the daytime than at night, whereas Dali Ancient City was most active at night. Tourists in Dali City mostly came from Yunnan Province, neighboring provinces, and economically developed coastal regions. Third, a text-based sentiment analysis revealed numerous high-frequency adjectives reflecting positive sentiment, indicating high scenic area satisfaction. Fourth, the number of internal POIs had the greatest effects on scenic area popularity and attractiveness. Specifically, the more POIs, the more popular and attractive the scenic area. The interactive decision-making power of various factors was greater than the decision-making power of individual factors. These findings provide insight into the determinants of scenic area satisfaction, providing a basis for the development of urban tourism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.