Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40372753›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Use of Biologics During Pregnancy Among Patients With Autoimmune Conditions.

Celeste L Y Ewig, Yanning Wang, Nicole E Smolinski, Thuy Nhu Thai, Sonja A Rasmussen, Almut G Winterstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Celeste L Y EwigDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Yanning WangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Nicole E SmolinskiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Thuy Nhu ThaiDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sonja A RasmussenDepartment of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Almut G WintersteinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Continuation of biologics in patients with an autoimmune condition who become pregnant involves weighing consequences of pregnancy-related changes in disease severity and potential teratogenic effects of medications. Characterization of biologic treatment patterns during pregnancy may provide insight into maternal and fetal risks and benefits. Objective: To describe the utilization pattern of biologics in pregnant individuals with autoimmune conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from Merative MarketScan Research Databases, which contain administrative claims of commercially insured individuals in the US. Pregnant patients aged 16 to 55 years with an autoimmune condition and biologic use 6 months before conception between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2022, were included. The data were analyzed between October 15, 2024, and February 28, 2025. Exposure: Use of biologics for autoimmune disease after conception. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of patients who used biologics for Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and multiple sclerosis was assessed, and the association between underlying autoimmune disease and use of biologics during pregnancy was measured using multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 6131 pregnant patients (median [IQR] age, 32 [29-36] years) with an autoimmune condition were included. The most prevalent conditions were Crohn disease (1372 patients [25.6%]) and rheumatoid arthritis (1295 patients [24.1%]). Of all patients, 4393 (71.6%; 95% CI, 70.5%-72.8%) used biologics at least once during pregnancy. Among pregnancies with live birth outcomes, biologic use declined throughout gestation, with 2981 patients (68.6% [95% CI, 67.2%-70.0%]), 2555 patients (58.8% [95% CI, 57.3%-60.3%]), and 2113 patients (48.6% [95% CI, 47.1%-50.1%]) using biologics during the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively, and 3350 patients (77.1% [95% CI, 75.8%-78.3%]) using them post partum. Compared with pregnant patients with rheumatoid arthritis, those with Crohn disease (odds ratio [OR], 7.88 [95% CI, 5.93-10.47]) and ulcerative colitis (OR, 5.35 [95% CI, 3.73-7.66]) were more likely to use biologics, while those with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (OR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52-0.80]) were less likely. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a decline in the use of biologics for autoimmune disease was observed during the pregnancy period that rebounded only partially thereafter. Notable variations in use across autoimmune conditions suggest that indication-specific risk-benefit assessments of biologic use are needed.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesBiological ProductsPregnancy ComplicationsAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyUnited StatesYoung AdultBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID40372753
PMCPMC12082371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.