ArticleJournal of community genetics2025
Lack of provision of social and emotional information about Down syndrome associated with negative prenatal diagnosis experiences.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Down Syndrome in British Maternity Care: Mothers' Experiences of Prenatal Testing and Receiving a Prenatal or Postnatal Diagnosis.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To determine how physician adherence to recommended practices for discussing Down syndrome (DS) impacts patient experiences, and which of these recommendations most correlate with positive prenatal patient experiences. Online surveys were distributed to mothers of children with DS born between 2016-2021. The descriptions of prenatal experiences were assigned sentiment analysis scores: positive, negative, or neutral. The scores were then compared against the adherence of clinicians to recommended practices for delivering prenatal screening results. Of the 167 patients in this study, over 50% described a negative experience. The odds of having a neutral/positive diagnosis experience were about 18 times greater for those patients whose physicians adhered to all seven social recommendations. The odds of having a positive/neutral screening experience were 11.4 times greater for those patients whose physicians adhered to both emotional recommendations (not saying "I'm sorry" or conveying the diagnosis as bad news"). Most of the variance in the patient diagnosis experience was attributed to adherence to emotional recommendations and social recommendations. To meet the needs of patients, obstetricians need to address emotional, social, and informational needs by providing 1) access to balanced and accurate information about disabilities and 2) being better trained on sensitive communications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.