Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40372593›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2025

Uncertainty monitoring in Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius).

M Loconsole, A K Schnell, E Garcia-Pelegrin, N S Clayton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M Loconsole *Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. maria.loconsole@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0024-2670
A K Schnell *Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. alex.k.schnell@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9223-0724
E Garcia-PelegrinDepartment of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0024-9861
N S ClaytonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-423X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metacognition- namely the capacity to reflect on one's own cognitive processes - provides animals with numerous evolutionary advantages. Metacognition abilities encompass enhanced decision-making in uncertain situations, more efficient resource management, error detection and correction, and improved problem-solving skills. Here, we investigate how Eurasian jays, Garrulus glandarius, monitor uncertainty through a working memory food-retrieval task. In this task, a desirable food item is hidden under one of two cups, which are then shuffled either once (easy treatment) or several times (difficult treatment). The jays then choose to either engage in locating the food or opt out by selecting a third cup that offers a less preferred food reward. Our findings reveal that the difficulty of the task significantly influenced the jays' choice, with a higher tendency to opt out during difficult trials. Individual performance analysis revealed that when jays that typically opted out of difficult trials chose to engage instead, they exhibited significant accuracy. This suggests their decisions were guided by a confidence assessment of their knowledge. Overall, our study indicates that Eurasian jays possess metacognitive abilities that enable them to evaluate their own certainty and make strategic decisions based on perceived task difficulty and confidence in their knowledge. These capabilities likely confer advantages in natural settings, such as caching behaviours, allowing jays to make well-informed decisions about when to store or retrieve food based on environmental cues and internal assessments of uncertainty.

Indexed as

MetacognitionPasseriformesAnimalsChoice BehaviorDecision MakingFemaleMaleMemory, Short-TermRewardUncertaintyAvian cognitionEurasian jaysIndividual differencesMetacognitionSelf-awarenessUncertainty monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40372593
PMCPMC12081489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.