ArticleArchives of women's mental health2025
Improving inpatient postpartum depression screening: results from a quality improvement initiative.
Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Who is screened for perinatal mental health? findings from an academic health system in California.Archives of women's mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeScreening is necessary to identify patients with postpartum depression or anxiety and facilitate access to mental healthcare. This study evaluated a quality improvement initiative for inpatient postpartum depression screening, which was implemented to better identify patients in need of mental healthcare. This initiative replaced the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) administered verbally by nurses with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS-10) self-administered by patients via iPads.
methodsElectronic medical records for patients who delivered June 2020-October 2023 at Cedars-Sinai were analyzed (N = 17,403). Differences in completed screenings, positive depression screenings, suicidal ideation, and social work referrals before and after the initiative were examined with chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression models. Factors associated with positive anxiety screenings on the EPDS-10 were also identified.
resultsOverall, 98.6% of patients completed depression screenings. Among those who completed screenings, positive depression screenings increased from 4.0 to 11.4%, identified suicidal ideation increased from 0.2 to 1.1%, and social work referrals increased from 64.1 to 84.0%, before and after the initiative. Post-initiative, patients had higher odds of positive depression screenings, indicating suicidal ideation, and receiving social work referrals compared to pre-initiative. Among those who completed EPDS-10 screenings, 31% were positive for anxiety.
conclusionsCompared to the PHQ-9 administered verbally by nurses, the EPDS-10 self-administered by patients via iPads resulted in higher rates of positive depression screenings, identified suicidal ideation, and social work referrals. It is imperative to accurately screen patients for postpartum depression and anxiety to facilitate access to mental healthcare and address morbidity and mortality. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.