ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Frontal midline theta power accounts for inter-individual differences in motor learning ability.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent neurophysiological studies have demonstrated that frontal midline theta (FMT) activity plays a significant role in motor learning. One of the key challenges in motor learning is to understand the interindividual variability in learning proficiency rates, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. To address this open question, this study recorded electroencephalogram activity from twenty-one healthy participants during a visuomotor tracking task to investigate whether modulation of FMT power and the theta phase synchronization across trials (theta phase consistency) during motor preparation could explain individual differences in learning proficiency. We found a significant positive correlation between increased FMT power during motor preparation and learning proficiency rates. Specifically, individuals with greater FMT power exhibited faster learning rates. In contrast, no significant correlation was observed between the consistency of the theta phase during motor preparation and learning proficiency. Together, these findings highlight that the FMT power, rather than phase synchrony, is closely associated with motor learning efficiency. This study provides a novel perspective for understanding the causes of individual differences in motor learning and further corroborates the previous evidence showing FMT power contributes to motor learning processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.