ArticleJournal of viral hepatitis2025
Droplet Digital PCR: A Powerful Tool for Accurate Quantification of Hepatitis D Virus RNA Levels and Verification of Detection Limits.
Article in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Diagnosis to Durability: A Review of the European Bulevirtide Experience and Practical Learnings for CHD Management.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Review
- Unexpectedly low prevalence of hepatitis delta virus infection in Southern Viet Nam.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unexpectedly Low Prevalence of Hepatitis Delta Virus Infection in Southern Viet Nam.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable quantification of hepatitis D virus (HDV) RNA levels is necessary for initiating and guiding antiviral treatment. The aim of this work is to develop and validate a digital PCR method for the accurate quantification of HDV RNA, including evaluation of its clinical accuracy, especially for low-concentrated clinical samples. The reverse transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR) development followed the standard procedure, including primer design, determination of linearity, calculation of recovery and the intermediate precision of the RNA extraction kits, determination of the limit of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ), droplet size measurements, conversion factor, and uncertainty budget. The World Health Organisation (WHO)-HDV international standard was used for RT-dPCR development. Commutability of the new method was explored, comparing RT-dPCR with quantification assays applied in clinical routine using clinical plasma samples covering a range of HDV RNA concentrations. The conversion factor from copies/mL to IU/mL was 0.77. LOD and LOQ of the RT-dPCR were 0.7 copies/mL (0.56 IU/mL) and 10 copies/mL (8 IU/mL), respectively. When evaluating the qualitative results of the clinical HDV samples at low concentrations, 31% of the HDV clinical samples tested negative by RT-qPCR were tested positive by RT-dPCR. The RT-qPCR and RT-dPCR quantitative data showed a good correlation with a standard deviation of ±1.12 log IU/mL. RT-dPCR is an accurate method for HDV RNA quantification that may serve as a complement to RT-qPCR, especially when accurate detection is essential for decision making in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.