Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371990›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Workshops as a Research Method in Health Science: Epistemological and Methodological Perspectives.

Bettina Trettin, Hanne Agerskov, Lene Lehmkuhl, Mette Juel Rothmann, Charlotte Myhre Jensen, Charlotte Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PEC innovation · 2026
    Article
  2. Integrating Dietitians Into Primary Dental Care for Paediatric Populations: Developing a Conceptual Service Pathway Through a Professional Stakeholder Workshop.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bettina TrettinDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3851-7294
Hanne AgerskovDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3271-0686
Lene LehmkuhlDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2196-5621
Mette Juel RothmannCentre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6505-4163
Charlotte Myhre JensenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7058-4641
Charlotte NielsenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8920-7758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this paper is twofold: (1) to introduce a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach and discuss its application within the context of WSs in the field of health science, (2) To present a method and a practical guide when conducting WSs in the field of health science. DESIGN AND

methodsEpistemological and methodological discussions based on workshops as a self-standing research method.

resultsThe epistemological and methodological discussions show that workshops conducted in health science are a self-standing research methods and align with a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach. Examples of research studies within this framework are provided to illustrate how workshops can be conducted in health science within this epistemological approach.

conclusionThe phenomenological-hermeneutical approach embraces workshops as a research method as it includes individual experiences through self-reflection and shared contributions through interpretation. Furthermore, a systematic approach with regard to planning, conduction, data collection, and data analysis leads to reliable findings, enhancing the transparency of the research method and thus creating scientific knowledge. This paper argues that the systematic approach of "the how" to conduct workshops with "the why" enhances the transparency and trustworthiness of the research. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Workshops are a way to involve and engage users in co-design processes that aim to develop solutions in clinical practice. User involvement has become an important part in academia and is essential in all aspects of the research process. However, we need solid systematic methods to create valid knowledge. Workshops are a self-standing research method, and a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach allows for an understanding of the phenomena as they unfold, emphasising subjective perceptions and meanings, which will finally lead to the development of a suitable solution for clinical practice. IMPACT: This paper contributes theoretical knowledge about the use of workshops as a research method. It combines "the how" to conduct a workshop with "the why" and highlights the relevance of a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach. The main argument is that workshops are a self-standing research method; hence, this paper adds value in the academic field as it provides a scientific framework. The paper presents a method and a practical guide for researchers who plan to conduct workshops in the field of health science. REPORTING

methodNo available EQUATOR guidelines were applicable to this methodological paper because no new data was created or analysed. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This is a methodological paper, and thus, there was no direct patient or public involvement.

Indexed as

KnowledgeResearch DesignHumansco‐designepistemologyhermeneuticsmethodologyphenomenologyresearch methodworkshops

Identifiers

PMID40371990
PMCPMC12994645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.