Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371922›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Characterizing the seminal microbiota in mature rams managed on divergent planes of nutrition, and their male offspring.

Justine Kilama, Devin B Holman, Kerri A Bochantin-Winders, Jennifer L Hurlbert, Friederike Baumgaertner, Christopher S Schauer, Carl R Dahlen, Samat Amat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Justine KilamaDepartment of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-8375-8994
Devin B HolmanLacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5306-3732
Kerri A Bochantin-WindersDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.
Jennifer L HurlbertDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.
Friederike BaumgaertnerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.
Christopher S SchauerHettinger Research Extension Center, North Dakota State University, Hettinger, ND 58639, USA.
Carl R DahlenDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4556-4315
Samat AmatDepartment of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6824-2431

Funding

North Dakota State Board of Agricultural Research and Education
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence suggests that there is a rich and diverse microbial community in the semen of mammals, which may be important in reproductive health and fertility. However, the composition of ram seminal microbiota remains under-characterized, with factors shaping it still largely unknown. The objectives of this study were to; 1) characterize the seminal microbiota of mature rams and their ram lambs using 16S rRNA gene sequencing; 2) evaluate whether managing the mature rams on divergent planes of nutrition can influence their seminal microbiota and that of their male offspring; and 3) compare the seminal microbiota between mature rams and ram lamb cohorts to identify age-related microbiota characteristics. For this, mature rams (n = 24) were assigned to one of the 3 nutritional planes: 1) Positive (POS), to gain 12% of initial body weight (BW) (n = 8), 2) maintenance (MAINT), to maintain BW (n = 8), and 3) negative (NEG), to lose 12% BW (n = 8) over an 84-d period. Semen samples were collected from the mature rams (F0) after 28-d, 56-d, and 84-d from the start of the trial. Following the 84-d period, the 24 rams were used to breed 240 mature ewes over 28-d. After lambing, the ram lambs (F1) sired by POS, MAINT, and NEG rams were maintained on the same diet until 11 months of age, at which semen samples were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted from the semen, and the microbiota was analyzed using 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4) sequencing. Overall, there was a relatively diverse and dynamic bacterial microbial community in the ram semen, mainly dominated by Actinobacteriota, Bacillota, Bacteroidota, and Proteobacteria phyla. The predominant genera identified included Fastidiosipila, Corynebacterium, Trueperella, Arthrobacter, Dietzia, and Bifidobacterium. The seminal microbial community structure, composition, and alpha diversity of F0 rams was influenced by diet during the first 28-d, but these diet influences later diminished. The paternal plane of nutrition did not influence the seminal microbiota of offspring ram lambs. The mature rams and ram lambs had distinct seminal microbiota, with young rams showing greater microbial richness and diversity (P < 0.005). Our results suggest that there is a relatively diverse and dynamic microbial community present in the semen of both mature rams and ram lambs, and that this microbiota is transiently influenced by diet and age. Managing rams on divergent planes of nutrition may not affect their offspring's seminal microbiota.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryMicrobiotaSemenAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacteriaDietFemaleMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSheepRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAnutritional planesramsseminal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID40371922
PMCPMC12202101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.