Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371899›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2025

Uncommon phenotypes of

Audrey N Jajosky, Marshall A Lichtman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The silent players: AtypicalOncology reports · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Audrey N JajoskyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and the James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Marshall A LichtmanDepartment of Medicine and the James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY. marshall_lichtman@urmc.rochester.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

bcr:ABL1-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) presents with a typical phenotype in over 95% of cases. These phenotypical cases are associated with a p210 oncoprotein (M-bcr genotype). In these cases, the consideration of CML is high on the list of differential diagnoses and appropriate genetic studies to confirm the BCR::ABL1 oncogene are de rigueur. The elevated white cell count, dominant granulocytes, myeloid immaturity and the absent to low blast concentration in the blood, the mild anemia, the normal platelet count or mild thrombocytosis and the frequency of basophilia usually point to the tentative diagnosis of CML or CML is included in the differential diagnosis without ambiguity. In a very small fraction of cases, the diagnosis of BCR::ABL1-positive CML is less evident. These syndromes include (i) BCR::ABL1-positive thrombocythemia, (ii) so-called neutrophilic BCR::ABL1-positive CML and (iii) the m-bcr (p190BCR-ABL1) variant of CML, often with an absolute and relative monocytosis. In these uncommon forms, there are often misleading blood cell counts. An interesting biological feature is the striking predominance of females in these three atypical presentations. In the fourth variant, (iv) eosinophilic predominant CML, the five reported cases have all been in males. We also consider the very rare phenomenon of (v) smoldering CML (synonyms pre-CML and aleukemic CML), which also has a female predominance. The misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of these atypical syndromes is consequential because of the beneficial response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in affected patients.

Indexed as

Fusion Proteins, bcr-ablLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcrFemaleHumansMalePhenotypeBCR-ABL1 fusion protein, humanFusion Proteins, bcr-ablProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcr

Identifiers

PMID40371899
PMCPMC12399941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.