Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371888›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2025

Treatment-related mutagenic processes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Cédric G Van der Ham, Frank N Van Leeuwen, Roland P Kuiper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cédric G Van der HamPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht.
Frank N Van LeeuwenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht.
Roland P KuiperPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Genetics, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht. r.kuiper@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Karyotyping, SNP arrays, fluorescence in situ hybridization and next-generation sequencing techniques have greatly improved our understanding of the genetic drivers of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In the past years, another layer of genetic data has been added by the study of mutational signatures, patterns of somatic mutations that represent specific mutational mechanisms. Mutational signatures can give insight into tumor development, but also reveal mutagenic side-effects of treatment in relapse samples. Multiple treatment-related mutational signatures have been detected in relapsed ALL that could play a role in therapy resistance and relapse development. In fact, multiple pathogenic driver mutations have been attributed to these treatment-related mutational processes, including a recurrent TP53 mutation. Studies in childhood ALL revealed that thiopurine exposure is the most common source of therapy-related mutagenicity in ALL and presents differently when patients are DNA mismatch repair deficient. Thiopurine-induced DNA damage indicates that leukemic cells were able to survive thiopurine exposure. This could be due to metabolic defects, acquired mutations that induce thiopurine resistance during treatment, or resistance to drugs synergizing with thiopurines. In this review, we discuss the types and prevalence of treatment-related mutational signatures in ALL, and explore mechanisms of thiopurine cytotoxicity and mutagenicity.

Indexed as

MutagenesisMutationPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaDNA DamageDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumans

Identifiers

PMID40371888
PMCPMC12485317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.