ReviewHaematologica2025
Treatment-related mutagenic processes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Review in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Karyotyping, SNP arrays, fluorescence in situ hybridization and next-generation sequencing techniques have greatly improved our understanding of the genetic drivers of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In the past years, another layer of genetic data has been added by the study of mutational signatures, patterns of somatic mutations that represent specific mutational mechanisms. Mutational signatures can give insight into tumor development, but also reveal mutagenic side-effects of treatment in relapse samples. Multiple treatment-related mutational signatures have been detected in relapsed ALL that could play a role in therapy resistance and relapse development. In fact, multiple pathogenic driver mutations have been attributed to these treatment-related mutational processes, including a recurrent TP53 mutation. Studies in childhood ALL revealed that thiopurine exposure is the most common source of therapy-related mutagenicity in ALL and presents differently when patients are DNA mismatch repair deficient. Thiopurine-induced DNA damage indicates that leukemic cells were able to survive thiopurine exposure. This could be due to metabolic defects, acquired mutations that induce thiopurine resistance during treatment, or resistance to drugs synergizing with thiopurines. In this review, we discuss the types and prevalence of treatment-related mutational signatures in ALL, and explore mechanisms of thiopurine cytotoxicity and mutagenicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.