ArticleTransfusion2025
A prospective non-inferiority trial of pathogen reduced platelets compared to non-pathogen reduced platelets for correction of viscoelastic platelet function testing in cardiac surgery.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may alter platelet (PLT) function causing bleeding. The goal of this study is to evaluate the hemostatic effect of PRT-PLTs compared to untreated PLTs stored in platelet additive solution (PAS) following transfusion in bleeding patients undergoing cardiac surgery on CPB.
methodsIn this single-center, prospective single-blinded two-arm noninferiority trial, patients being weaned off CPB were allocated to either a PRT-PLT or a standard PAS-PLT. The primary outcome was the change in maximum amplitude (ΔMA) on thromboelastographic testing (TEG) from pre- to post-transfusion. The non-inferiority margin was chosen as 50% of the ΔMA observed with PAS-PLT using a 1-sided 95% confidence interval. The secondary outcomes included the volume of chest tube drainage (CTD) and the number of blood products transfused during the first 24 h post-surgery.
resultsA modified intention-to-treat analysis included 90 patients (48 PRT-PLTs; 42 PAS-PLTs). The ΔMA for PRT-PLT was 2.93 mm (95% CI 1.52-4.34) and was lower than that achieved with PAS-PLT at 5.68 mm (95% CI 3.26-8.09) (2-tailed p = .052). The ratio of ΔMA for PRT-PLT relative to PAS-PLT was estimated at .52 with a 90% confidence interval (.29, .89) and did not meet the non-inferiority criterion (>.5). The CTD and the number of blood products transfused during the first 24 h post-surgery were similar in both arms.
conclusionPRT-PLT transfusion results in lower responses in viscoelastic testing compared to PAS-PLT, although clinical outcomes with respect to blood component utilization and chest tube drainage were similar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.