Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371874›Full record

ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale

Perceptions of Otolaryngologists on Single-Entry Models for Managing Wait Times in Community-Based Health Care in Ontario: A Qualitative Study.

Justin Shapiro, Jonah Perlmutter, Charlotte Axelrod, Saruchi Bandargal, Gabie Pundaky, Ben B Levy, Veronica Grad, John de Almeida, Joel Davies, Brian Rotenberg and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Justin ShapiroDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6559-9515
Jonah PerlmutterTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Charlotte AxelrodDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2688-3633
Saruchi BandargalFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3763-2119
Gabie PundakySchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Ben B LevyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Veronica GradSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-1628-2817
John de AlmeidaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joel DaviesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brian RotenbergDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Antoine EskanderDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Janet ChungDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
David R UrbachInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yvonne ChanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ImportanceLong wait times for medical care have been exacerbated following the pandemic in many health systems. Single-entry models (SEMs) have been proposed as a strategy to manage growing surgical backlogs and increase timeliness and quality of care by creating a single queue and centralizing the referral triage process.ObjectiveThe primary objective was to evaluate the perceptions of SEMs among community otolaryngologists for managing surgical backlogs. The secondary objectives were to better understand their experiences with the current system and to investigate their recommendations for implementing an SEM.DesignInterpretive Description.SettingOntario, Canada.ParticipantsNine community-based otolaryngologists.Intervention/ExposuresNot available.MethodsVirtual semi-structured interviews were conducted with study participants. Data were independently analyzed using inductive and deductive methods by multiple team members. Results were triangulated, and a final coding framework was developed collaboratively from which themes were identified.Main Outcome MeasuresPerceptions of SEMs as well as recommendations for design and implementation.ResultsThree thematic domains and 9 subdomains were identified from our interview data: (1) factors affecting the utility of SEMs; (2) opinions and buy-in of physicians; and (3) opportunities to improve equity.Conclusions and RelevanceWe identified a number of factors that should be considered in supporting community-based otolaryngologists to adopt SEMs as a strategy for ensuring timely and equitable access to care. Clinical leaders and specialty organizations play a pivotal role for such changes to succeed. Implementing SEMs may be an important step toward increasing equity, quality, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness in otolaryngology.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunity Health ServicesOtolaryngologistsOtolaryngologyWaiting ListsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleOntarioQualitative ResearchTriageallergy/rhinologyclinicalclinical researchhealth policyhealth servicesoutcomes/cost-effectivenesspediatricsquality of life

Identifiers

PMID40371874
PMCPMC12081981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.