ArticleCancer medicine2025
Residual Volume and Total Lung Capacity at Diagnosis Predict Overall Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResidual volume (RV) / total lung capacity (TLC) ratio has been found to better predict functional impairments than spirometry and is associated with mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; however, it is rarely studied in lung cancer. Our previous work established spirometry as a prognostic factor for lung cancer, and we aimed to further investigate the prognostic value of TLC and RV in lung cancer patients.
methodsWe identified newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent static lung function tests prior to any cancer therapy between 1992 and 2020 in a longitudinal cohort of lung cancer patients: the Boston Lung Cancer Study. Cox proportional-hazards model was used to estimate the association between each lung volume test with overall survival.
resultsAmong 2348 NSCLC patients, 57.2% were diagnosed at stage I and 63.8% underwent surgery, with 1352 deaths observed over a median survival of 66.9 months. Higher RV, RV%, and lower TLC, TLC% were associated with worse overall survival marginally; RV/TLC was associated with overall survival as a quantitative trait, with one standard deviation (11.24%) increase in RV/TLC associated with 19.2% higher risk of mortality (HR = 1.192 [95% CI: 1.114, 1.277]) after covariate adjustment. Statistically significant interactions were found between RV/TLC and spirometry, and higher mortality risks were found with higher RV/TLC in patients across spirometry status and cancer stages.
conclusionNSCLC patients with higher RV/TLC ratios at diagnosis had worse overall survival, even when spirometry was within the predicted range. These findings suggest that lung volume measurements provide prognostic information beyond standard spirometry, supporting the need for further mechanistic and interventional studies to determine their clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.