Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371807›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Benchmarking Zinc-Binding Site Predictors: A Comparative Analysis of Structure-Based Approaches.

Cosimo Ciofalo, Vincenzo Laveglia, Claudia Andreini, Antonio Rosato

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cosimo CiofaloDepartment of Chemistry, University of Florence, Via della Lastruccia 3, Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-0371-1280
Vincenzo LavegliaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Florence, Via della Lastruccia 3, Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy.
Claudia AndreiniDepartment of Chemistry, University of Florence, Via della Lastruccia 3, Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy.
Antonio RosatoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Florence, Via della Lastruccia 3, Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6172-0368

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metalloproteins play crucial physiological roles across all domains of life, relying on metal ions for structural stability and catalytic activity. In recent years, computational approaches have emerged as powerful and increasingly reliable tools for predicting metal-binding sites in metalloproteins, enabling their application in the challenging field of metalloproteomics. Given the growing number of available tools, it is timely to design a reproducible approach to characterize their performance in specific usage scenarios. Thus, in this study, we selected some state-of-the-art structure-based predictors for zinc-binding sites and evaluated their performance on two data sets: experimental apoprotein structures and structural models generated by AlphaFold. Our results indicate that apoprotein structures pose significant challenges for predicting metal-binding sites. For these systems, the predictors achieved lower-than-expected performance due to the structural rearrangements occurring upon metalation. Conversely, predictions based on AlphaFold models yielded significantly better results, suggesting that they more closely resemble the holo forms of metalloproteins. Our findings highlight the great potential of metal-binding site predictions for advancing research in the field of metalloproteomics.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMetalloproteinsZincBenchmarkingBinding SitesModels, MolecularProtein ConformationMetalloproteinsZinc

Identifiers

PMID40371807
PMCPMC12117554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.