ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Benchmarking Zinc-Binding Site Predictors: A Comparative Analysis of Structure-Based Approaches.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Master of Metals2: a graph neural network based architecture for the prediction of zinc binding sites in protein structures.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metalloproteins play crucial physiological roles across all domains of life, relying on metal ions for structural stability and catalytic activity. In recent years, computational approaches have emerged as powerful and increasingly reliable tools for predicting metal-binding sites in metalloproteins, enabling their application in the challenging field of metalloproteomics. Given the growing number of available tools, it is timely to design a reproducible approach to characterize their performance in specific usage scenarios. Thus, in this study, we selected some state-of-the-art structure-based predictors for zinc-binding sites and evaluated their performance on two data sets: experimental apoprotein structures and structural models generated by AlphaFold. Our results indicate that apoprotein structures pose significant challenges for predicting metal-binding sites. For these systems, the predictors achieved lower-than-expected performance due to the structural rearrangements occurring upon metalation. Conversely, predictions based on AlphaFold models yielded significantly better results, suggesting that they more closely resemble the holo forms of metalloproteins. Our findings highlight the great potential of metal-binding site predictions for advancing research in the field of metalloproteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.