ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
Seasonal patterns of preterm birth in the Netherlands: A population-based cohort study.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seasonal patterns of preterm birth in the Netherlands: A population-based cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreterm birth is subject to seasonal periodicity, dependent on geographical, meteorological, and environmental factors. This study aims to assess whether preterm birth in the Netherlands is subject to seasonal periodicity. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe performed a population-based cohort including singleton births between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 between 24 + 0 and 42 + 6 weeks of gestation in the Netherlands. The primary outcome was the incidence of preterm birth <37 weeks. Secondary outcomes were total, spontaneous, and iatrogenic preterm birth <28, <32, and <37 weeks of gestation. Preterm birth incidence was calculated per conception month and as a proportion of fetuses-at-risk, taking into account the number of ongoing pregnancies at risk for preterm birth. The incidence of preterm birth <37 weeks per conception month and out of fetuses-at-risk was plotted for the 10-year study period. Incidences were reported as rates, and seasonality was tested with logistic regression and autocorrelation function with a 12-month lag.
resultsIn total, 1 598 554 births were included in the 10-year study period. The average monthly birth count varied from 12 006 (February) to 14 293 (September). The average monthly preterm birth count varied from 610 (February) to 728 (July). Over the total study period, the incidence of preterm birth <37 weeks was 5.16%. Pregnancies conceived in April and May had the highest incidences of preterm birth <37 weeks (5.58% and 5.38%, respectively). Out of fetuses-at-risk, preterm birth incidences were highest in October, December, and January (between 1.38% and 1.42%) and lowest in February (1.22%) and April (1.22%). The ten-year incidence of preterm birth <37 weeks revealed a consistent seasonal pattern, with annually recurrent peaks in preterm birth incidence each year (p < 0.001).
conclusionsIn the Netherlands, the incidence of preterm birth in singletons is subject to seasonal periodicity. Conception in April and May is associated with the highest risk of preterm birth. Fetuses are at the highest risk for preterm birth from October to January and at the lowest risk in February and April.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.