Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Cardiovascular Benefit of Colchicine in Relation to Baseline Risk: A Secondary Analysis of the LoDoCo2 Trial.
Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colchicine in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Residual Atherothrombotic Risk After Myocardial Infarction: Integrating Lipid, Inflammatory and Thrombotic Pathways.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Anti-Inflammatory Therapies in Acute Coronary Syndromes-A Review of Immunological, Genetic, and Clinical Challenges for Precision Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Colchicine in Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence Structure, Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Translational Positioning Across Cardiovascular Syndromes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A Review of Emerging Biomarkers Connecting Diabetes and Ischemic Stroke: Implications for Early Detection and Risk Stratification.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe LoDoCo2 (Low-Dose Colchicine 2) trial showed that colchicine reduced the risk for cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Current guidelines recommend colchicine use in selected high-risk patients. The aim of this secondary analysis was to explore the relative and absolute benefits of colchicine according to baseline risk.
methodsThe LoDoCo2 trial randomized 5522 patients to colchicine 0.5 mg or placebo. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization. First, a LoDoCo2 risk score was developed by Cox regression to identify high-risk features for the primary end point. Second, the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention was applied to explore robustness of findings.
resultsIn the LoDoCo2 risk score, high-risk features were age ≥75, diabetes, and current smoker. In high-risk (≥1 high-risk feature), compared with low-risk (0 high-risk features) patients, colchicine was associated with consistent relative (high risk: hazard ratio [HR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.56-0.94] versus low risk: HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.52-0.88];
conclusionsIn patients with chronic coronary syndrome, the relative and absolute benefits of colchicine were consistent in those at high, intermediate, and low risk for cardiovascular events. These findings support the use of colchicine across the spectrum of baseline risk. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au; Unique identifier: 12614000093684.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.