Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371626›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2025

Cardiovascular Benefit of Colchicine in Relation to Baseline Risk: A Secondary Analysis of the LoDoCo2 Trial.

Niekbachsh Mohammadnia, Britta E Wesselink, Willem A Bax, Stefan M Nidorf, Arend Mosterd, Aernoud T L Fiolet, Aysun Cetinyurek-Yavuz, Peter L Thompson, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, John W Eikelboom and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Niekbachsh MohammadniaDepartment of Cardiology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Britta E WesselinkDepartment of Cardiology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Willem A BaxDepartment of Internal Medicine Northwest Clinics Alkmaar Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2177-1475
Stefan M NidorfHeart and Vascular Research Institute of Western Australia Perth WA Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2226-538X
Arend MosterdDutch Network for Cardiovascular Research (WCN) Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6906-2643
Aernoud T L FioletDutch Network for Cardiovascular Research (WCN) Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5328-2564
Aysun Cetinyurek-YavuzIQ Health Science Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4024-8775
Peter L ThompsonHeart and Vascular Research Institute of Western Australia Perth WA Australia.
Shrikant I BangdiwalaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3111-0689
John W EikelboomDepartment of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4126-1285
Jan H CornelDepartment of Cardiology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1006-2112
Saloua El MessaoudiDepartment of Cardiology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-0804-2071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe LoDoCo2 (Low-Dose Colchicine 2) trial showed that colchicine reduced the risk for cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Current guidelines recommend colchicine use in selected high-risk patients. The aim of this secondary analysis was to explore the relative and absolute benefits of colchicine according to baseline risk.

methodsThe LoDoCo2 trial randomized 5522 patients to colchicine 0.5 mg or placebo. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization. First, a LoDoCo2 risk score was developed by Cox regression to identify high-risk features for the primary end point. Second, the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention was applied to explore robustness of findings.

resultsIn the LoDoCo2 risk score, high-risk features were age ≥75, diabetes, and current smoker. In high-risk (≥1 high-risk feature), compared with low-risk (0 high-risk features) patients, colchicine was associated with consistent relative (high risk: hazard ratio [HR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.56-0.94] versus low risk: HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.52-0.88];

conclusionsIn patients with chronic coronary syndrome, the relative and absolute benefits of colchicine were consistent in those at high, intermediate, and low risk for cardiovascular events. These findings support the use of colchicine across the spectrum of baseline risk. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au; Unique identifier: 12614000093684.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesColchicineSecondary PreventionAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSecondary Data AnalysisTreatment OutcomeColchicinechronic coronary syndromecolchicinerisk stratificationsecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID40371626
PMCPMC12184580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.