ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Relationship Between Objective Performance and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function in Patients With Stroke.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aligning metrics with meaning: considerations for measurement selection in disability evaluation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between self-reported physical function (PF) and objective performance in patients with stroke remains unclear. This study explored how various self-reported health domains influence the correlation between Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PF and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.
methodsA retrospective cohort study examined patients with stroke who completed the TUG and PROMIS PF within 90 days post stroke. Correlations between these measures were analyzed, both overall and stratified by performance on other patient-reported outcomes (Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders cognitive function, depression, and the following PROMIS scales: global health, social satisfaction, pain, sleep, and fatigue). Structural equation modeling assessed how these patient-reported outcomes influenced the PROMIS PF-TUG relationship.
resultsThere were 432 patients with average age 63.7 (SD 13.5) years. Average TUG and PROMIS PF scores were 16.6 (SD 10.4) seconds and 36.8 (SD 8.5), respectively. TUG and PROMIS PF showed moderate correlation (r=-0.47 [95% CI, -0.54 to -0.40]). Fatigue (r=-0.53 [95% CI, -0.59 to -0.45]) and satisfaction with social roles (r=0.53 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.60]) had the strongest correlations with PROMIS PF. Both social roles (estimate=0.08, SE=0.02,
conclusionsThere is only moderate correlation between self-reported PF and the performance measure TUG, which is mediated by fatigue and satisfaction with social roles. These findings highlight the importance of considering these broader dimensions of health in addition to physical capacity when interpreting patient-reported PF scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.