ArticleCancer medicine2025
Rising Threat: Long-Term Trends in the Incidence and Mortality of Thymic Epithelial Tumor.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nationwide trends in mediastinal tumor and myasthenia gravis surgery in Japan: a decade claims-based analysis (2014-2023).International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Advanced thymic epithelial tumours after neoadjuvant therapy: a narrative review of surgical challenges and strategies.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2026Review
- Development of Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Progression Risk in High-Risk Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma Utilizing Clinical and Preoperative CT Features.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAn upward trend in the incidence of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) has been reported over the past few decades, but because of its rarity, little is currently known about its epidemiological trends. This study examined temporal trends in the incidence and mortality of TETs in the US and explored these trends in population subgroups while investigating important factors that influence their prognosis.
methodsA retrospective, population-based study was conducted using nationally representative data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, and 4979 patients diagnosed with TETs from 2000 to 2020 were evaluated. Associated population data were used to determine age-adjusted incidence and mortality, and 5-year TET-specific mortality (SM). Trends were assessed for the entire cohort, as well as for particular subgroups, including thymoma and thymic carcinoma.
resultsFrom 2000 to 2020, the overall incidence and mortality of TETs were 2.769 and 1.203 per million person-years, respectively. Both the age-adjusted incidence and mortality of TETs increased over the study period, with increases occurring across almost all ethnic groups, histological subtypes, and stages. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, World Health Organization histological type (B1, B2, and B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma), Masaoka-Koga stage (IIB and III/IV), maximum tumor diameter (5-10 and > 10 cm), surgery, and chemotherapy were independently associated with TET-SM.
conclusionsThe incidence and mortality of TETs have steadily increased over time, and these trends might be related to the widespread use of computed tomography for lung cancer screening and the increasing number of TETs found incidentally. The study also identified several important factors independently associated with TET-SM, suggesting that early diagnosis and surgical intervention are critical to achieving good prognoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.