ArticleJournal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine2025
A pediatric rehabilitation therapy audit study: A brief report.
Article in Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeChildren with disabilities benefit from physical, occupational, and speech therapy, but families identify unmet needs for these services. The purpose of this study was to audit access to therapy services in a tri-state region. It was hypothesized that children who were publicly insured and children from minoritized identity groups would face greater access barriers and longer wait times than children covered by private insurance and non-minoritized White children.MethodsThis prospective audit study utilized callers who posed as mothers seeking outpatient therapy services for their child. Access difficulties were identified based on the number of phone calls required to obtain an appointment or determine if services would be obtained at all, as well as the number of days to the earliest available appointment.ResultsTherapy appointment access was a problem for 47.4% of simulated families. After 251 phone calls, 91 simulated families were able to schedule appointments in 76 clinics. Black and Hispanic simulated families had a harder time getting appointments, but days to appointment did not differ by telegraphed minoritized identity (F(3,88) = 1.474, p = .227).ConclusionSimulated families experienced substantial barriers to arranging therapy appointments with Black and Hispanic families experiencing more barriers than their White and Muslim peers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.