Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371491›Full record

ArticleCNS spectrums2025

An exploration of the determinants of risk formulation, care plan and disposition among older adults in the Ontario forensic psychiatry system: implication for practice.

Mark M Kaggwa, Joan Abaatyo, Arianna Davids, Angela Li, Rebecca Marsh, Precious Agboinghale, John M W Bradford, Gary A Chaimowitz, Andrew T Olagunju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS spectrums, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mark M KaggwaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University/St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Joan AbaatyoDepartment of Psychiatry, https://ror.org/007pr2d48Uganda Christian University, Kampala, Uganda.
Arianna DavidsForensic Psychiatry Program, https://ror.org/009z39p97St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Angela LiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University/St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Rebecca MarshDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University/St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Precious AgboinghaleForensic Psychiatry Program, https://ror.org/009z39p97St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
John M W BradfordDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University/St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Gary A ChaimowitzDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University/St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Andrew T OlagunjuDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University/St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1736-9886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in medicine have led to an improvement in life expectancy, thus increasing the population of older individuals within the criminal justice system. This study investigates the determinants of risk formulation, care plan, and disposition among older adult forensic patients (OAFP) in Ontario, Canada.

methodsThis retrospective analysis utilized the Ontario Review Board database, focusing on 161 OAFP, aged 55 years and older. Hierarchical regression was used to analyze the relationship between changes in risk and six blocks of variables: sociodemographic characteristics (Block 1), circumstances during the index offense (Block 2), current clinical profile (Block 3), past psychiatric history and behavioral patterns (Block 4), criminal history and legal status (Block 5), and recent violent events (Block 6).

resultsThe median age of patients was 61 years (IQR 58-67), with 83.4% being male. Schizophrenia was the most common diagnosis (68.3%), and 9.3% had neurocognitive disorders. The model with six blocks of factors explained 92% of the variability in risk change. Models 2 (blocks 1 and 2) and 4 (blocks 1-4) were statistically significant, explaining 34% (p = 0.010) and 22% (p = 0.018) of the variance in the change in risk of threat to public safety, respectively. OAFP with a significant risk to public safety were more likely to be inpatients and less likely intoxicated during their index offense.

conclusionResources, policies, and a supervised model of care to curtail behavioral risks are relevant to the care of OAFP. Innovative risk management models for OAFP are indicated.

Indexed as

Forensic PsychiatryMental DisordersAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentForensic psychiatrygeriatricsindex offensenot-criminally responsiblerisksubstance useunfit-to-stand trial

Identifiers

PMID40371491
PMCPMC13064726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.