ReviewCirculation. Heart failure2025
Hierarchical Analysis of Composite Time-to-Event End Points in Heart Failure Clinical Trials Using Time in Clinical State.
Review in Circulation. Heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Definition, analysis, reporting, and interpretation of perioperative bleeding in randomized controlled trials: a methodological systematic review.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Much work has been done on developing hierarchical composite end point analysis methods, which meaningfully measure the effect of a treatment for patients with heart failure. Two motivations for this work have been as follows: (1) trying to ensure that more severe outcomes are weighted more heavily in the analysis; (2) combining different types of end points such as death, number of recurrent hospitalizations, and continuous functional or biologic end points. Such methods include the win ratio, the win odds, and the proportion in favor of treatment. In this article, our focus is when all components are clinical end points such as death or hospitalizations and do not include continuous end points. We review these methods using HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training). We also describe recent methods for combining different clinical end points, which take into account the time a subject is in a particular clinical state. These include the pairwise win time, the restricted mean time in favor of treatment, the expected win time, and the expected win time against reference. We discuss the US Food and Drug Administration guidances and make general recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.