Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371480›Full record

ReviewCirculation. Heart failure2025

Hierarchical Analysis of Composite Time-to-Event End Points in Heart Failure Clinical Trials Using Time in Clinical State.

Eric S Leifer, James F Troendle, Mitchell A Psotka, Vandana Sachdev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation. Heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric S LeiferOffice of Biostatistics Research (E.S.L., J.F.T.), Division of Intramural Research of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health/Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-6888-8307
James F TroendleOffice of Biostatistics Research (E.S.L., J.F.T.), Division of Intramural Research of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health/Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.
Mitchell A PsotkaHeart Failure and Transplant, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (M.A.P.).ORCID 0000-0001-7571-9886
Vandana SachdevCardiovascular Branch (V.S.), Division of Intramural Research of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health/Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-1168-5055

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much work has been done on developing hierarchical composite end point analysis methods, which meaningfully measure the effect of a treatment for patients with heart failure. Two motivations for this work have been as follows: (1) trying to ensure that more severe outcomes are weighted more heavily in the analysis; (2) combining different types of end points such as death, number of recurrent hospitalizations, and continuous functional or biologic end points. Such methods include the win ratio, the win odds, and the proportion in favor of treatment. In this article, our focus is when all components are clinical end points such as death or hospitalizations and do not include continuous end points. We review these methods using HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training). We also describe recent methods for combining different clinical end points, which take into account the time a subject is in a particular clinical state. These include the pairwise win time, the restricted mean time in favor of treatment, the expected win time, and the expected win time against reference. We discuss the US Food and Drug Administration guidances and make general recommendations.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicEndpoint DeterminationHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited Statesbiological productsexerciseheart failurehospitalizationrandomized controlled trials as topic

Identifiers

PMID40371480
PMCPMC12233999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.