ReviewCentral European journal of urology2025
Review of different convolutional neural networks used in segmentation of prostate during fusion biopsy.
Review in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive utility and associated challenges of adolescent arm scarring in suicide risk assessment.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of prostate cancer is increasing in Poland, particularly due to the aging population. This review explores the potential of deep learning algorithms to accelerate prostate contouring during fusion biopsies, a time-consuming but crucial process for the precise diagnosis and appropriate therapeutic decision-making in prostate cancer. Implementing convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can significantly improve segmentation accuracy in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Material and methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed and IEEE Xplore, focusing on open-access studies from the past five years, and following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review evaluates the enhancement of prostate contouring and segmentation in MRI for fusion biopsies using CNNs. Results: The results indicate that CNNs, particularly those utilizing the U-Net architecture, are predominantly selected for advanced medical image analysis. All the reviewed algorithms achieved a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) above 74%, indicating high precision and effectiveness in automatic prostate segmentation. However, there was significant heterogeneity in the methods used to evaluate segmentation outcomes across different studies. Conclusions: This review underscores the need for developing and optimizing segmentation algorithms tailored to the specific needs of urologists performing fusion biopsies. Future research with larger cohorts is recommended to confirm these findings and further enhance the practical application of CNN-based segmentation tools in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.