Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371413›Full record

ReviewMedicine and pharmacy reports2025

The importance of multimodal diagnostic methods for therapeutic decision making for overactive bladder in women.

Mihaela Ivanov, Emil Ceban

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mihaela IvanovDepartment of Urology and Surgical Nephrology, "Nicolae Testemitanu" State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Emil CebanDepartment of Urology and Surgical Nephrology, "Nicolae Testemitanu" State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: Despite overactive bladder (OAB) being a symptomatic diagnosis, all patients require a basic assessment to confirm the diagnosis, as well as to exclude any other underlying cause for lower urinary tract dysfunction. While guidelines clearly define different methods of investigations for OAB, there are reasons to believe that these guidelines reflect more of a "one size fits all" model that may not be appropriate for use in all patients. The study aimed to elucidate the complex and advanced multidisciplinary methods of investigation of OAB patients. Methods: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were used to search for scientific publications from 2013 to 2023 using relevant keywords and phrases. Results: Data from 708 publications were researched and synthesized, a systematic review was carried out and the detailed and coherent results presented the diagnostic aspects of overactive bladder in women. Relevant citations from selected articles were included, and a synthesis of key information was provided. Conclusion: These discoveries may assist in detecting OAB earlier, allowing for prompt intervention and potentially preventing the condition from progressing to more severe stages and providing healthcare professionals with valuable tools to enhance the diagnosis and treatment of OAB, potentially improving the quality of life for patients affected by this condition.

Indexed as

autonomic nervous systemoveractive bladderurodynamicswomen

Identifiers

PMID40371413
PMCPMC12070906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.