ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2025
Antibiotics consumption in neurosurgery versus appendectomy: a call for antibiotic stewardship initiatives.
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a significant global health concern, including in Indonesia. The administration of prophylactic antibiotics plays a pivotal role in the prevention and the reduction in mortality rates associated with SSIs. Prophylactic antibiotic use is recommended in surgical procedures that are at risk of infection, including in clean surgical operations that last more than three hours and clean-contaminated surgeries. The objective of this study was to analyze the quantity of prophylactic antibiotic consumption and to compare the consumption of antibiotics between neurosurgery (clean surgery) and appendectomy (clean-contaminated surgery). Methods: Data in this observational study were obtained from the medical records of patients who underwent neurosurgery and appendectomy at two hospitals in Surabaya: one private and one public hospital. The quantity of antibiotic consumption will be analyzed descriptively and presented as a defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 bed days. Results: Research findings revealed a higher quantity of antibiotic consumption in elective neurosurgery, representing 47.43 DDD/100 bed-days, in comparison to 21.26 DDD/100 bed-days and 76.34 DDD/100 bed-days in elective and emergency appendectomy, respectively. The most frequently used antibiotics were broad-spectrum antibiotics, which included cefixime (36.91 DDD/100 bed-days) and ceftriaxone (5.45 DDD/100 bed-days) in elective neurosurgery; and ceftriaxone (14.94 vs 50.86 DDD/100 bed-days) and metronidazole (5.75 vs 19.16 DDD/100 bed-days) in elective and emergency appendectomy, respectively. Conclusion: The consumption of prophylaxis antibiotics remains a significant concern. In order to develop strategies to prevent bacterial resistance through an antibiotic stewardship program, it is essential to evaluate antibiotic consumption and monitor trends over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.