ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2025
Colonic polyps in North-Western Romania: a comprehensive single-center analysis of endoscopic and pathological features.
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Most colorectal cancers (CRC) originate from precancerous adenomatous and serrated lesions. Accepted risk determinants for conventional adenomas and CRC include age, male gender and familial history. The aim of our study was to outline the characteristics of colorectal polyps in our center, as well as to uncover associations between them and certain clinical presentations. Methods: We retrospectively collected the data available in a tertiary center of the patients that underwent colonoscopy for various indications (e.g.: rectorrhagia, abdominal pain, screening, anemia etc.) between the 1 Results: 248 subjects were identified and included in the study. There were 584 polyps uncovered during the colonoscopies in 248 subjects. 498 polyps were excised and retrieved; 44.5% were right-sided and 55.5% were left-sided. Most of the polyps were < 1 cm (78.2%). There were significantly more adenomatous polyps (68.8%) than non-adenomatous (31.2%). Most of the polyps had a low grade of dysplasia (59.8%). There were significant associations between the polyp size and dysplasia grade, number and location on the transverse colon. Polyps under 1 cm were more likely to be tubular (p=0.008). The age of the patients >50 years was associated with a greater number of polyps (p=0.002). There was a moderate statistically significant association (p=0.0297) between the male gender and the number of adenomatous polyps. Conclusions: Male gender, age greater than 50 years, history of colorectal polyps are risk factors for the development of colorectal polyps in the studied population. A history of more than 2 polyps and a size greater of 1 cm can be associated with higher rates of dysplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.