Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371320›Full record

ReviewPublic health reviews2025

Health Education and Promotion Interventions to Mitigate Geophagic Practise: A Scoping Review.

Mohora Feida Malebatja, Moreoagae Bertha Randa, Mathildah Mpata Mokgatle, Oluwafemi Omoniyi Oguntibeju

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohora Feida MalebatjaDepartment of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Division, School of Healthcare Sciences, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.
Moreoagae Bertha RandaDepartment of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Division, School of Healthcare Sciences, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mathildah Mpata MokgatleDepartment of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Division, School of Healthcare Sciences, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.
Oluwafemi Omoniyi OguntibejuPhytomedicine and Phytochemistry Group, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Wellness Sciences, Cape Peninsula University, Bellville, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to review health education and promotion interventions that will assist in mitigating the practise of geophagy to reduce the potential health risks, mortalities and morbidities that are linked to geophagic practise. Methods: A scoping review was carried out guided by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework and PRISMA reporting flowchart. Results: This scoping review found that health education and promotion interventions focusing on geophagy, nutrition, the uptake of iron and folic acid supplements, the potential health risks of geophagy, anaemia risk during pregnancy, oral and intravenous iron therapy and randomised trials are some of the methods that are currently used to prevent and control the practise of geophagy amongst women of reproductive age at antenatal care units, school and community level. Conclusion: It is concluded that the existing health education and promotion interventions that can assist women of reproductive age to cease the practise of geophagia are not effective. More emphasis should be given to the establishment of health education awareness programmes on the practise of geophagy, nutrition, and iron and folic acids uptake at community level.

Indexed as

geophagiageophagy interventionshealth education and promotioniron deficiency anaemiawomen of reproductive age

Identifiers

PMID40371320
PMCPMC12074957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.