ReviewPublic health reviews2025
Health Education and Promotion Interventions to Mitigate Geophagic Practise: A Scoping Review.
Review in Public health reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Maternal geophagy in Ghana: a mini review of toxicological, microbial, nutritional, and radiological exposure pathways.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to review health education and promotion interventions that will assist in mitigating the practise of geophagy to reduce the potential health risks, mortalities and morbidities that are linked to geophagic practise. Methods: A scoping review was carried out guided by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework and PRISMA reporting flowchart. Results: This scoping review found that health education and promotion interventions focusing on geophagy, nutrition, the uptake of iron and folic acid supplements, the potential health risks of geophagy, anaemia risk during pregnancy, oral and intravenous iron therapy and randomised trials are some of the methods that are currently used to prevent and control the practise of geophagy amongst women of reproductive age at antenatal care units, school and community level. Conclusion: It is concluded that the existing health education and promotion interventions that can assist women of reproductive age to cease the practise of geophagia are not effective. More emphasis should be given to the establishment of health education awareness programmes on the practise of geophagy, nutrition, and iron and folic acids uptake at community level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.