Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371318›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025

The 2023 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Luis Carrasco Cabrera, Giulio Di Piazza, Bruno Dujardin, Emanuela Marchese, Paula Medina Pastor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Residues of Desiccant Herbicides in Sesame Seeds (Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Electrochemical Sensors for Pesticide Residue Detection.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The 2024 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Luis Carrasco Cabrera
Giulio Di Piazza
Bruno Dujardin
Emanuela Marchese
Paula Medina Pastor

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under European Union legislation (Article 32, Regulation (EC) No 396/2005), the European Food Safety Authority publishes an annual report assessing the pesticide residue levels in food. In 2023, as part of the EU-coordinated multiannual control programme subset, 13,246 samples placed on the European market were analysed, with a 1.0% found to be non-compliant. Risk-based sampling procedures were used for the remaining 132,793 samples with a 2.0% non-compliant rate. Both dietary acute and chronic risk to consumers' health were estimated providing the probabilities of exceedance of the health-based guidance values (HBGV) for the pesticides in food by the different subpopulation of European consumers. This meant dropping the deterministic assessment used in the past. Overall, the dietary risk was found to be very low for most of the EU subpopulation groups. Recommendations were provided to risk managers to increase the effectiveness of European control systems and to ensure a high level of consumer protection throughout the EU.

Indexed as

acutechronicdietary exposureEuropean Unionfood safetymaximum residue levelsnational monitoring programmepesticide residuesprobabilityrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40371318
PMCPMC12076349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.