ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The impact of personal medical savings accounts on healthcare utilization and out-of-pocket costs in public basic health insurance: a national cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health Insurance Schemes and Chronic Disease Management Behaviours in China: Evidence from Women with Non-Communicable Diseases.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Previous research has shown that the implementation of personal medical savings accounts in health insurance can impact health utilization and medical cost through enhancing individual responsibility for their own health. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are differences in various healthcare utilization and out-of-pocket payment ratios between insured individuals with and without personal medical savings accounts in the context of basic medical insurance in China. Methods: A nationally representative cross-sectional data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study was used to analyze. Seemingly Unrelated Regression analysis was conducted to examine the potential impact of personal medical savings accounts on the utilization rates and self-payment ratios for outpatient services, hospitalization, dental treatment, and physical examinations. Heckman selection model was used as a sensitivity analysis to test the robust of original results. Results: A total of 15,628 individuals were included in the analysis. Among them, 95.5% were covered by basic medical insurance, while only 12.8% had a personal medical savings account. Possessing a personal medical savings account was significantly associated with increased utilization of dental services (OR: 1.327, 95% CI: 1.05-1.67) and a higher frequency of physical examinations (OR: 2.271, 95% CI: 1.86-2.77). This effect was not significant in outpatient and inpatient health service utilization. Furthermore, having a personal medical savings account was significantly associated with lower out-of-pocket payment ratios across various healthcare services. Specifically, individuals with such accounts experienced a 15.8 percentage point reduction in outpatient services, a 22.1 percentage point reduction in inpatient services, and a 13.4 percentage point reduction in dental services. Conclusion: The study revealed disparities between individuals with and without personal medical savings accounts in China. While these accounts can cover the insurer's regular medical expenses, their effect on high-cost expenses appears to be limited. These findings suggest that reforms in medical insurance should focus on reducing the gap between insured individuals with and without personal medical savings accounts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.