ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The impact of
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting pro-environmental behavioral intention using interpretable machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Interruption in physical activity behavior among Chinese adults in 2015 and 2020: trends and multilevel correlates based on two national surveys.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Does public spending on sports improve people's health? Empirical evidence from China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The impact of sports participation on the psychological state of the Chinese population from the perspective of sports resources.PloS one · 2026Article
- Adolescent sports participation and social-class health inequalities: evidence from CHNS.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Individual determinants and community moderators of sports participation in overweight and obese adults: a hierarchical linear model analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The relationship between music listening and subjective well-being: evidence from the Chinese General Social Survey (2010-2023).Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Communities are the main places where the public spend their daily activities, and suitable community environments can help improve their subjective well-being. However, there is still limited evidence on how fitness environments in communities affect the public's subjective well-being. In recent years, Chinese governments have been created the Methods: This study utilizes data from the 2021 China General Social Survey (CGSS) to integrate the Result: Our research findings indicate the following: (1) the Conclusion: The study concludes that community fitness facilities are of great relevance in improving the subjective well-being of the public. The results of the study provide empirical support for the rationalization of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.