Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371265›Full record

ArticleAnalytical science advances2025

Comparison Between a New PSA Assay With the Well-Established Beckman Coulter Immunoassay: A Preliminary Report.

Evelina La Civita, Mariano Fiorenza, Giuseppe Jannuzzi, Carmela Polito, Rosa Sirica, Gianluigi Carbone, Domenica Sorvillo, Aniello Saviano, Matteo Ferro, Daniela Terracciano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evelina La CivitaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences University of Naples "Federico II" Naples Italy.
Mariano FiorenzaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences University of Naples "Federico II" Naples Italy.
Giuseppe JannuzziDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences University of Naples "Federico II" Naples Italy.
Carmela PolitoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences University of Naples "Federico II" Naples Italy.
Rosa SiricaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences University of Naples "Federico II" Naples Italy.
Gianluigi CarboneDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences University of Naples "Federico II" Naples Italy.
Domenica SorvilloDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences University of Naples "Federico II" Naples Italy.
Aniello SavianoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences University of Naples "Federico II" Naples Italy.
Matteo FerroUnit of Urology Department of Health Science University of Milan ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo Milan Italy.
Daniela TerraccianoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences University of Naples "Federico II" Naples Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4296-429X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a critical biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa) patient clinical management. In this study, we sought to compare three different immunoassays (CLIA): Beckman Coulter Access Hybritech (PSA-B) (reference method), Immulite 2000 PSA (PSA-I) and the newly introduced Atellica IM PSA assay (PSA-A). We selected serum samples from our routine clinical testing at University Hospital Federico II between April and May 2024 from 104 men with a median age of 66 years (interquartile range = 57-74). Total PSA was determined using three different assays: PSA-B, PSA-A and PSA-I. A significant correlation between PSA-B and PSA-I assays was found for samples in the overall population (Spearman

Indexed as

immunoassaysprostate cancerPSA

Identifiers

PMID40371265
PMCPMC12077752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.