ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Safety and efficacy of apatinib in combination treatment versus apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apatinib Plus PD-1 Blockade versus Chemotherapy After Prior Immunotherapy in Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of adjuvant low-dose apatinib combined with SOX regimen versus SOX regimen in patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer: a cohort study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Apatinib is a systemic therapeutic agent for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA). Its efficacy can be enhanced by applying it as a combination therapy, but the evidence supporting its combination application as a second-line treatment is not well documented. In the current study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of apatinib, both as a monotherapy and in combination regimens, for second-line treatment of GAC and GEJA in real-world settings. Methods: In this retrospective cohort analysis, we analyzed clinical data from 96 patients with advanced GAC or GEJA who received second-line apatinib monotherapy or combination therapy. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors influencing clinical outcomes of different treatment approaches (apatinib combination with other drugs). Results: The results indicated that the overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for second-line apatinib therapy were 19.8% and 31.3%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.8 months (95% CI: 4.3-6.2m), while the median overall survival (mOS) was 10.3 months (95% CI: 8.9-12.4m). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified gender, liver metastasis, and peritoneal metastasis as independent predictors of inferior PFS and OS outcomes. In terms of safety, the primary adverse reactions included myelosuppression, elevated AST and ALT levels, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, hyperbilirubinemia, proteinuria, fatigue, and vomiting, with a low incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities. Conclusions: Apatinib-based combination therapy significantly enhances both progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer when compared to monotherapy, while also demonstrating a safe and reliable profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.