Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40371206›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterology

Pancreatic ascites: update on diagnosis and management.

Lefika Bathobakae, Heba Farhan, Derya Mücahit, Dina Rohira, Kashyap Chauhan, Yana Cavanagh, Walid Baddoura, Derick J Christian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lefika BathobakaeInternal Medicine, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ (Lefika Bathobakae).
Heba FarhanRowan-Virtua University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ (Heba Farhan, Derya Mücahit).
Derya MücahitRowan-Virtua University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ (Heba Farhan, Derya Mücahit).
Dina RohiraSt. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, Grenada, West Indies (Dina Rohira).
Kashyap ChauhanGastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ (Kashyap Chauhan, Yana Cavanagh, Walid Baddoura).
Yana CavanaghGastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ (Kashyap Chauhan, Yana Cavanagh, Walid Baddoura).
Walid BaddouraGastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ (Kashyap Chauhan, Yana Cavanagh, Walid Baddoura).
Derick J ChristianInterventional and Therapeutic Endoscopy, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ (Yana Cavanagh).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ascites is a rare condition characterized by the accumulation of high-amylase ascitic fluid in the peritoneal cavity. This condition is often associated with chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic trauma, or pseudocyst rupture. Because of its rarity and ill-defined clinical presentation, pancreatic ascites is often a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in clinical practice. The current diagnostic criteria include an amylase level >1000 mg/dL, a protein level >3 g/dL, and a serum ascites albumin gradient <1.1 g/dL. The clinical features vary, but may include progressive abdominal distension, diffuse abdominal pain, weight loss and peritonitis. The management of pancreatic ascites remains controversial, and there is no consensus regarding the optimal approach. Conservative medical management, which includes nutritional support, pain control, therapeutic paracentesis and the use of somatostatin analogs, has been associated with a high failure rate and significant morbidity. Interventional therapies, such as surgery and endoscopic transpapillary stenting, have shown more promising outcomes. However, the choice between these methods is still debated, with some advocating for endoscopic approaches, because of their minimally invasive nature and reduced morbidity compared with surgical options. Endoscopic approaches remain underutilized in practice, probably because of the need for repeated interventions, the potential risks associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, or a lack of skilled personnel. Although they show significant perioperative morbidity and mortality, surgical options provide definitive resolution of pancreatic ascites. Herein, we provide an updated review of pancreatic ascites, highlighting advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic approaches, and summarizing insights from recent clinical cases and retrospective studies.

Indexed as

chronic pancreatitisduct disruptionendoscopic stentingPancreatic ascitespseudocyst

Identifiers

PMID40371206
PMCPMC12070342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.