ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced bowel angioedema: clinical features, diagnostic challenges, and recovery predictors from survival analysis: a systematic review of current reported cases.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced bowel angioedema (ACEi-IAE) is a rare and frequently under-recognized condition. Its nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms could lead to missed diagnoses, unnecessary procedures and inappropriate treatments. Given the scarcity of studies, we conducted a systematic review to summarize the clinical characteristics of ACEi-IAE, the diagnostic approach and factors predicting delayed recovery. Methods: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, OVID and EMBASE, were used to identified eligible studies from inception to November 2024. Eligible cases were required to have a clear diagnosis of ACEi-IAE. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with delayed recovery time. Results: Our systematic review included 81 eligible studies, comprising 117 ACEi-IAE cases with a mean age of 50 years, of which 83% were female. Patients were mainly African Americans (50%) taking lisinopril (71%). All patients (100%) presented with abdominal pain and other non-specific features. The median recovery time was 48 h after discontinuing ACEi. Patients who had been taking lisinopril for a longer than average period (25.9 months) had a statistically significantly lower hazard ratio for recovery (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.81; P=0.012), as did patients who had radiographic evidence of jejunal edema (aHR 0.29, 95%CI 0.11-0.74; P=0.010). Diagnostic criteria were proposed and summarized based on the findings. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of ACEi-induced bowel angioedema, particularly in ACEi users with non-specific abdominal pain. Implementation of our proposed diagnostic criteria is recommended to prevent unnecessary investigation and inappropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.